19-10166590-G-A

Position:

• chr19-10166590-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BA1

The NM_001130823.3(DNMT1):​c.891+8C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0042 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 62 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0031 (3 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0043 (59 hom.)
• Consequence: DNMT1 NM_001130823.3 splice_region, intron
• Scores: Splicing: ADA: 0.00009541
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.854

Genes affected

DNMT1 (HGNC:2976): (DNA methyltransferase 1) This gene encodes an enzyme that transfers methyl groups to cytosine nucleotides of genomic DNA. This protein is the major enzyme responsible for maintaining methylation patterns following DNA replication and shows a preference for hemi-methylated DNA. Methylation of DNA is an important component of mammalian epigenetic gene regulation. Aberrant methylation patterns are found in human tumors and associated with developmental abnormalities. Variation in this gene has been associated with cerebellar ataxia, deafness, and narcolepsy, and neuropathy, hereditary sensory, type IE. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
• BP6: Variant 19-10166590-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-10166590-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 193835.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-10166590-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr19-10166590-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BA1: GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (MID) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0608 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
DNMT1	NM_001130823.3	c.891+8C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant		ENST00000359526.9
DNMT1	NM_001318730.2	c.843+8C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant
DNMT1	NM_001318731.2	c.528+8C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant
DNMT1	NM_001379.4	c.843+8C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
DNMT1	ENST00000359526.9	c.891+8C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant		1	NM_001130823.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00316 AC: 481 AN: 152130 Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000531

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00302

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.0202

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00642

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.000754

Gnomad MID AF: 0.0411

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00404

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00765

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00487 AC: 1224 AN: 251472 Hom.: 12 AF XY: 0.00520 AC XY: 707 AN XY: 135914

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000800

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00402

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.0208

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00611

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00129

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00511

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.0107

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00431 AC: 6295 AN: 1461702 Hom.: 59 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00451 AC XY: 3281 AN XY: 727158

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000866

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00389

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.0227

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00653

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00114

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00371

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00613

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00315 AC: 479 AN: 152248 Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00308 AC XY: 229 AN XY: 74434

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000529

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00301

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.0202

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00622

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.000754

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00404

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00757

Alfa AF: 0.00578 Hom.: 2

Bravo AF: 0.00316

Asia WGS AF: 0.00318 AC: 11 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.00692

EpiControl AF: 0.00646

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Aug 01, 2024	DNMT1: PP3, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Jul 21, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -

not specified Benign:3

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jun 21, 2016	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Dec 02, 2014	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -

Hereditary sensory neuropathy-deafness-dementia syndrome Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 24, 2024	- -

DNMT1-related disorder Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Jun 28, 2019

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.82
CADD	Benign	7.9
DANN	Benign	0.40
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.1

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA	Benign	0.000095
dbscSNV1_RF	Benign	0.0060
SpliceAI score (max)		0.93		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DL_spliceai		0.93		Position offset: 8

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117294281; hg19: chr19-10277266;