19-10166590-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001130823.3(DNMT1):​c.891+8C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0042 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 62 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0031 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0043 ( 59 hom. )

Consequence

DNMT1
NM_001130823.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00009541
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.854

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNMT1 (HGNC:2976): (DNA methyltransferase 1) This gene encodes an enzyme that transfers methyl groups to cytosine nucleotides of genomic DNA. This protein is the major enzyme responsible for maintaining methylation patterns following DNA replication and shows a preference for hemi-methylated DNA. Methylation of DNA is an important component of mammalian epigenetic gene regulation. Aberrant methylation patterns are found in human tumors and associated with developmental abnormalities. Variation in this gene has been associated with cerebellar ataxia, deafness, and narcolepsy, and neuropathy, hereditary sensory, type IE. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
DNMT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia, deafness and narcolepsy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hereditary sensory neuropathy-deafness-dementia syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 19-10166590-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-10166590-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 193835.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (MID) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0608 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DNMT1NM_001130823.3 linkc.891+8C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 11 of 40 ENST00000359526.9 NP_001124295.1 P26358-2I6L9H2
DNMT1NM_001318730.2 linkc.843+8C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 10 of 39 NP_001305659.1 P26358Q59FP7I6L9H2
DNMT1NM_001379.4 linkc.843+8C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 10 of 39 NP_001370.1 P26358-1I6L9H2
DNMT1NM_001318731.2 linkc.528+8C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 11 of 40 NP_001305660.1 P26358I6L9H2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNMT1ENST00000359526.9 linkc.891+8C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 11 of 40 1 NM_001130823.3 ENSP00000352516.3 P26358-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00316
AC:
481
AN:
152130
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000531
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00302
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0202
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00642
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000754
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0411
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00404
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00765
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00487
AC:
1224
AN:
251472
AF XY:
0.00520
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000800
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00402
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0208
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00511
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0107
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00431
AC:
6295
AN:
1461702
Hom.:
59
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00451
AC XY:
3281
AN XY:
727158
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000866
AC:
29
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00389
AC:
174
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0227
AC:
592
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39688
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00653
AC:
563
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00114
AC:
61
AN:
53400
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0663
AC:
382
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00371
AC:
4123
AN:
1111898
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00613
AC:
370
AN:
60366
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.450
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
353
705
1058
1410
1763
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
160
320
480
640
800
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00315
AC:
479
AN:
152248
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00308
AC XY:
229
AN XY:
74434
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000529
AC:
22
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00301
AC:
46
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0202
AC:
70
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00622
AC:
30
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000754
AC:
8
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0408
AC:
12
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00404
AC:
275
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00757
AC:
16
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
22
44
65
87
109
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00578
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00316
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00692
EpiControl
AF:
0.00646

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

DNMT1: PP3, BS2 -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 03, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Dec 02, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 21, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary sensory neuropathy-deafness-dementia syndrome Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

DNMT1-related disorder Benign:1
Jun 28, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
7.9
DANN
Benign
0.40
PhyloP100
0.85
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000095
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0060
SpliceAI score (max)
0.93
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DL_spliceai
0.93
Position offset: 8

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117294281; hg19: chr19-10277266; API