19-10352442-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_003331.5(TYK2):c.3310C>A(p.Pro1104Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,455,528 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P1104A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003331.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- immunodeficiency 35Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003331.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYK2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.3310C>A | p.Pro1104Thr | missense | Exon 23 of 25 | ENSP00000431885.1 | P29597 | ||
| TYK2 | TSL:1 | c.2755C>A | p.Pro919Thr | missense | Exon 19 of 21 | ENSP00000433203.1 | E9PM19 | ||
| TYK2 | TSL:4 | c.3310C>A | p.Pro1104Thr | missense | Exon 23 of 25 | ENSP00000436175.2 | P29597 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1455528Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000276 AC XY: 2AN XY: 724294 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at