19-10829116-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001005361.3(DNM2):​c.2139T>C​(p.Ala713Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.307 in 1,613,602 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 78,330 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A713A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.30 ( 7084 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.31 ( 71246 hom. )

Consequence

DNM2
NM_001005361.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.76

Publications

32 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNM2 (HGNC:2974): (dynamin 2) Dynamins represent one of the subfamilies of GTP-binding proteins. These proteins share considerable sequence similarity over the N-terminal portion of the molecule, which contains the GTPase domain. Dynamins are associated with microtubules. They have been implicated in cell processes such as endocytosis and cell motility, and in alterations of the membrane that accompany certain activities such as bone resorption by osteoclasts. Dynamins bind many proteins that bind actin and other cytoskeletal proteins. Dynamins can also self-assemble, a process that stimulates GTPase activity. Five alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different proteins have been described. Additional alternatively spliced transcripts may exist, but their full-length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
MIR6793 (HGNC:50251): (microRNA 6793) microRNAs (miRNAs) are short (20-24 nt) non-coding RNAs that are involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in multicellular organisms by affecting both the stability and translation of mRNAs. miRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II as part of capped and polyadenylated primary transcripts (pri-miRNAs) that can be either protein-coding or non-coding. The primary transcript is cleaved by the Drosha ribonuclease III enzyme to produce an approximately 70-nt stem-loop precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA), which is further cleaved by the cytoplasmic Dicer ribonuclease to generate the mature miRNA and antisense miRNA star (miRNA*) products. The mature miRNA is incorporated into a RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which recognizes target mRNAs through imperfect base pairing with the miRNA and most commonly results in translational inhibition or destabilization of the target mRNA. The RefSeq represents the predicted microRNA stem-loop. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 19-10829116-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-10829116-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 158523.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.76 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.561 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DNM2NM_001005361.3 linkc.2139T>C p.Ala713Ala synonymous_variant Exon 19 of 21 ENST00000389253.9 NP_001005361.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNM2ENST00000389253.9 linkc.2139T>C p.Ala713Ala synonymous_variant Exon 19 of 21 5 NM_001005361.3 ENSP00000373905.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.300
AC:
45622
AN:
151982
Hom.:
7058
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.279
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.314
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.271
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.310
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.578
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.303
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.342
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.357
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.291
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.296
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.312
AC:
78204
AN:
250390
AF XY:
0.313
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.281
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.256
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.319
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.564
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.321
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.291
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.313
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.308
AC:
449698
AN:
1461502
Hom.:
71246
Cov.:
56
AF XY:
0.307
AC XY:
223397
AN XY:
727050
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.281
AC:
9419
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.255
AC:
11413
AN:
44672
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.313
AC:
8182
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.576
AC:
22875
AN:
39682
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.309
AC:
26645
AN:
86238
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.317
AC:
16909
AN:
53272
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.337
AC:
1943
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.300
AC:
333313
AN:
1111880
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.315
AC:
18999
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
22607
45214
67820
90427
113034
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
11214
22428
33642
44856
56070
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.300
AC:
45696
AN:
152100
Hom.:
7084
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.305
AC XY:
22708
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.280
AC:
11622
AN:
41502
American (AMR)
AF:
0.271
AC:
4150
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.310
AC:
1074
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.578
AC:
2981
AN:
5158
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.303
AC:
1461
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.342
AC:
3621
AN:
10582
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.360
AC:
105
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.291
AC:
19768
AN:
67964
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.297
AC:
628
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1636
3272
4907
6543
8179
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
470
940
1410
1880
2350
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.288
Hom.:
15448
Bravo
AF:
0.298
Asia WGS
AF:
0.419
AC:
1459
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.303
EpiControl
AF:
0.296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 24, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ala713Ala in exon 19 of DNM2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 29.1% (2504/8600) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequen cing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2229920). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 12, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate B Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Autosomal dominant centronuclear myopathy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.91
CADD
Benign
0.23
DANN
Benign
0.45
PhyloP100
-4.8
PromoterAI
-0.00020
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2229920; hg19: chr19-10939792; COSMIC: COSV53033084; COSMIC: COSV53033084; API