19-10987905-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001387283.1(SMARCA4):c.1099C>T(p.Leu367=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000961 in 1,612,790 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L367L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001387283.1 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARCA4 | NM_001387283.1 | c.1099C>T | p.Leu367= | synonymous_variant | 6/36 | ENST00000646693.2 | |
SMARCA4 | NM_003072.5 | c.1099C>T | p.Leu367= | synonymous_variant | 6/35 | ENST00000344626.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARCA4 | ENST00000646693.2 | c.1099C>T | p.Leu367= | synonymous_variant | 6/36 | NM_001387283.1 | |||
SMARCA4 | ENST00000344626.10 | c.1099C>T | p.Leu367= | synonymous_variant | 6/35 | 1 | NM_003072.5 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152108Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000157 AC: 38AN: 241306Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000159 AC XY: 21AN XY: 131678
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000897 AC: 131AN: 1460682Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000826 AC XY: 60AN XY: 726616
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152108Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74308
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 15, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jan 09, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 05, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 26, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 16 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Coffin-Siris syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at