19-11102699-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 7P and 4B. PP1_ModeratePM2BS3PS4_SupportingPP3PP4
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.226G>T (p.Gly76Trp) variant is classified as Uncertain significance - conflicting evidence for Familial Hypercholesterolemia by applying evidence codes BS3, PS4_Supporting, PM2, PP1_Moderate, and PP4 as defined by the ClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Expert Panel LDLR-specific variant curation guidelines (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.012). The supporting evidence is as follows: BS3: Level 1 assays: PMID 25741862: Heterologous cells (CHO), western blot and flow cytometry assays - result: 100% low-density lipoprotein particle receptor biosynthetic process; 90% low-density lipoprotein particle binding; 95% low-density lipoprotein particle clearance. ---- The whole cycle is above 90% of wild-type activity. So, BS3 is met. PS4_Supporting: Variant meets PM2 and is identified in 2 index cases (1 case with DLCN criteria of definite FH from U4M - Lille University & CHRU Lille and 1 case with Simon Broome criteria of possible FH from Cardiovascular Research Group,Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge). So, PS4_Supporting is met. PM2: This variant is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD v2.1.1). So, PM2 is met. PP3: REVEL=0.898. It is above 0.75, so PP3 is met. PP1_Moderate: Variant segregates with FH phenotype in 4 informative meioses in 1 family from Cardiovascular Research Group,Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge. So, PP1_Moderate is met. PP4: Variant meets PM2 and is identified in 2 unrelated index cases who fulfill clinical criteria for FH from different labs, after alternative causes of high cholesterol were excluded (see PS4 for details). So, PP4 is met. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA10584797/MONDO:0007750/013
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000527.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | NM_000527.5 | c.226G>T | p.Gly76Trp | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 18 | ENST00000558518.6 | NP_000518.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000123 AC: 18AN: 1461652Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000963 AC XY: 7AN XY: 727134
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Pathogenic:2Uncertain:2Benign:2
subject mutated among 2600 FH index cases screened = 1 , family member = 1 with co-segregation / mild phenotype / Software predictions: Damaging -
- -
- -
The NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.226G>T (p.Gly76Trp) variant is classified as Uncertain significance - conflicting evidence for Familial Hypercholesterolemia by applying evidence codes BS3, PS4_Supporting, PM2, PP1_Moderate, and PP4 as defined by the ClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Expert Panel LDLR-specific variant curation guidelines (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.012). The supporting evidence is as follows: BS3: Level 1 assays: PMID 25741862: Heterologous cells (CHO), western blot and flow cytometry assays - result: 100% low-density lipoprotein particle receptor biosynthetic process; 90% low-density lipoprotein particle binding; 95% low-density lipoprotein particle clearance. ---- The whole cycle is above 90% of wild-type activity. So, BS3 is met. PS4_Supporting: Variant meets PM2 and is identified in 2 index cases (1 case with DLCN criteria of definite FH from U4M - Lille University & CHRU Lille and 1 case with Simon Broome criteria of possible FH from Cardiovascular Research Group,Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge). So, PS4_Supporting is met. PM2: This variant is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD v2.1.1). So, PM2 is met. PP3: REVEL=0.898. It is above 0.75, so PP3 is met. PP1_Moderate: Variant segregates with FH phenotype in 4 informative meioses in 1 family from Cardiovascular Research Group,Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge. So, PP1_Moderate is met. PP4: Variant meets PM2 and is identified in 2 unrelated index cases who fulfill clinical criteria for FH from different labs, after alternative causes of high cholesterol were excluded (see PS4 for details). So, PP4 is met. -
- -
0/100 normolipidemic individuals -
Familial hypercholesterolemia Uncertain:1Benign:1
The p.Gly76Trp variant in LDLR has been reported in at least 1 Portuguese individual with familial hypercholesterolemia (PMID: 17765246), and was absent from large population studies. This variant has also been reported in ClinVar as having conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (Variation ID: rs574337291). In vitro functional studies provide some evidence that the p.Gly76Trp variant may not impact protein function (PMID: 25741862). However, these types of assays may not accurately represent biological function. Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to determine pathogenicity. In summary, the clinical significance of the p.Gly76Trp variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PM2, PP3, BS3_supporting (Richards 2015). -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: LDLR c.226G>T (p.Gly76Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Low-density lipoprotein receptor domain class A (IPR002172) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 251490 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.226G>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Familial Hypercholesterolemia, as well as control cohorts (e.g.Bourbon_2008, Tada_2022, Grzymski_2020, Trinder_2020). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Familial Hypercholesterolemia. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Benito-Vicente_2015). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant on protein expression and localization, or LDL binding and internalization. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 25741862, 17765246, 32719484, 36229376, 33079599). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 251081). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Identified in a patient with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in published literature (PMID: 17765246); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); A published functional study suggests the p.(G76W) showed similar levels of expression and trafficking to cell surface compared to wildtype (PMID: 25741862); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Also known as p.(G55W); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32719484, 29261184, 29874871, 27821657, 22881376, 17765246, 25741862) -
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
The p.G76W variant (also known as c.226G>T), located in coding exon 3 of the LDLR gene, results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 226. The glycine at codon 76 is replaced by tryptophan, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This alteration has been reported in a familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) cohort with limited clinical details and in a cohort of 29,906 healthy individuals who underwent multigene panel testing (Bourbon M et al. Atherosclerosis, 2008 Feb;196:633-42; Grzymski JJ et al. Nat Med, 2020 08;26:1235-1239). An in vitro assay showed this alteration may not impact protein function (Benito-Vicente A et al. Genet Med, 2015 Dec;17:980-8). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at