19-11116926-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1773C>T(p.Asn591=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.417 in 1,613,584 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 147,093 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.34 ( 10427 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.43 ( 136666 hom. )
Consequence
LDLR
NM_000527.5 synonymous
NM_000527.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.22
Genes affected
LDLR (HGNC:6547): (low density lipoprotein receptor) The low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene family consists of cell surface proteins involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis of specific ligands. The encoded protein is normally bound at the cell membrane, where it binds low density lipoprotein/cholesterol and is taken into the cell. Lysosomes release the cholesterol, which is made available for repression of microsomal enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase, the rate-limiting step in cholesterol synthesis. At the same time, a reciprocal stimulation of cholesterol ester synthesis takes place. Mutations in this gene cause the autosomal dominant disorder, familial hypercholesterolemia. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
BP6
Variant 19-11116926-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-11116926-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 200917.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-11116926-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.22 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.433 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | NM_000527.5 | c.1773C>T | p.Asn591= | synonymous_variant | 12/18 | ENST00000558518.6 | NP_000518.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | ENST00000558518.6 | c.1773C>T | p.Asn591= | synonymous_variant | 12/18 | 1 | NM_000527.5 | ENSP00000454071 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.337 AC: 51230AN: 151818Hom.: 10439 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
51230
AN:
151818
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.389 AC: 97866AN: 251472Hom.: 20537 AF XY: 0.396 AC XY: 53812AN XY: 135912
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
97866
AN:
251472
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
53812
AN XY:
135912
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.426 AC: 622001AN: 1461646Hom.: 136666 Cov.: 43 AF XY: 0.425 AC XY: 309181AN XY: 727136
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
622001
AN:
1461646
Hom.:
Cov.:
43
AF XY:
AC XY:
309181
AN XY:
727136
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.337 AC: 51210AN: 151938Hom.: 10427 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.341 AC XY: 25314AN XY: 74240
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
51210
AN:
151938
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
25314
AN XY:
74240
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
923
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Department of Human Genetics, Laborarztpraxis Dres. Walther, Weindel und Kollegen | Jun 11, 2018 | Due to the increased occurrence of the mutation (>= 5%) and the current estimates of databases (LOVD 3), this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge | Mar 01, 2016 | 19 Hmz + 62 htz / 125 non-FH individuals; MAF = 48,3% in 86 Spanish healthy individuals - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jun 22, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital | Mar 30, 2023 | Population allele frequency is 38% (rs688, 106341/277102 alleles in gnomAD v2.0.2). Based on the classification scheme RMH ACMG Guidelines v1.1.1, this variant is classified as Benign. Following criteria met: BA1. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Laboratorium voor Moleculaire Diagnostiek Experimentele Vasculaire Geneeskunde, Academisch Medisch Centrum | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Mar 25, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | LDLR-LOVD, British Heart Foundation | Mar 25, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Dec 31, 2015 | p.Asn591Asn in exon 12 of LDLR: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 37.8% (45902/121396) of chromosomes tested by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.or g; dbSNP rs688). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Familial hypercholesterolemia Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GENinCode PLC | Jul 14, 2022 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Cohesion Phenomics | Feb 09, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 08, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at