19-11123264-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 1P and 2B. BP4BP2PS3_Supporting
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The NM_000527.5(LDLR): c.2231G>A (p.Arg744Gln) variant is classified as Likely benign for Familial Hypercholesterolemia by applying evidence codes BP4, BP2 and PS3_supporting as defined by the ClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Expert Panel LDLR-specific variant curation guidelines (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.012).The supporting evidence is as follows:BP4 - REVEL score is 0.291. It is below 0.5, so splicing evaluation is required. Functional data on splicing is not available. A) Variant not on limits. B) Variant is exonic and within range, but it does not create a de novo AG or GT site. The variant is not predicted to alter splicing.BP2 - 2 individuals from Ambry Genetics: Patient 1 has LDLR p.Gln33* in trans. Phenotype LDL 111 mg/dl (on treatment); Patient 2 has LDLR p.Gly373Asp in trans. Phenotype = "high chol".PS3_supporting - level 3 assay (PMID:9409298) - Heterozygous patients' lymphoblasts, immunoblotting, I125-LDL assay: no precursor detectable, degradation of 125I-LDL = 73%.Variant has 2 Supporting evidence codes towards Benign, enough to classify as Likely benign, and only 1 Supporting evidence code towards Pathogenic. The Benign criteria overwhelms the Pathogenic criteria, so we are confident in classifying this variant as Likely benign. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA023651/MONDO:0007750/013
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000558518.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | NM_000527.5 | c.2231G>A | p.Arg744Gln | missense_variant | 15/18 | ENST00000558518.6 | NP_000518.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | ENST00000558518.6 | c.2231G>A | p.Arg744Gln | missense_variant | 15/18 | 1 | NM_000527.5 | ENSP00000454071 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000664 AC: 101AN: 152084Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000855 AC: 215AN: 251340Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000942 AC XY: 128AN XY: 135872
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000959 AC: 1402AN: 1461766Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000942 AC XY: 685AN XY: 727196
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000664 AC: 101AN: 152200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000591 AC XY: 44AN XY: 74414
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1Benign:10
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation | Mar 23, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | LDLR-LOVD, British Heart Foundation | Mar 25, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cardiovascular Biomarker Research Laboratory, Mayo Clinic | Aug 31, 2016 | MAF =<0.3%. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Jul 30, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Variant Curation Expert Panel | May 27, 2022 | The NM_000527.5(LDLR): c.2231G>A (p.Arg744Gln) variant is classified as Likely benign for Familial Hypercholesterolemia by applying evidence codes BP4, BP2 and PS3_supporting as defined by the ClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Expert Panel LDLR-specific variant curation guidelines (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.012). The supporting evidence is as follows: BP4 - REVEL score is 0.291. It is below 0.5, so splicing evaluation is required. Functional data on splicing is not available. A) Variant not on limits. B) Variant is exonic and within range, but it does not create a de novo AG or GT site. The variant is not predicted to alter splicing. BP2 - 2 individuals from Ambry Genetics: Patient 1 has LDLR p.Gln33* in trans. Phenotype LDL 111 mg/dl (on treatment); Patient 2 has LDLR p.Gly373Asp in trans. Phenotype = "high chol". PS3_supporting - level 3 assay (PMID: 9409298) - Heterozygous patients' lymphoblasts, immunoblotting, I125-LDL assay: no precursor detectable, degradation of 125I-LDL = 73%. Variant has 2 Supporting evidence codes towards Benign, enough to classify as Likely benign, and only 1 Supporting evidence code towards Pathogenic. The Benign criteria overwhelms the Pathogenic criteria, so we are confident in classifying this variant as Likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | U4M - Lille University & CHRU Lille, Université de Lille - CHRU de Lille | Mar 30, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely pathogenic, flagged submission | research | Institute for Integrative and Experimental Genomics, University of Luebeck | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre de Génétique Moléculaire et Chromosomique, Unité de génétique de l'Obésité et des Dyslipidémies, APHP, GH Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière / Charles-Foix | Dec 16, 2016 | subjects mutated among 2600 FH index cases screened = 7 / previously described in association with FH/Software predictions: Benign - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Laboratorium voor Moleculaire Diagnostiek Experimentele Vasculaire Geneeskunde, Academisch Medisch Centrum | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Laboratory of Genetics and Molecular Cardiology, University of São Paulo | Mar 01, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Muenster | Dec 31, 2023 | ACMG categories: BP1,BP4 - |
not provided Benign:6Other:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 18, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | SNPedia | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | in vitro | Dept. of Genetics and Pharmacogenomics, Merck Research Labs | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Dec 23, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2024 | LDLR: BP4, BS1 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 01, 2017 | Variant summary: The LDLR c.2231G>A (p.Arg744Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant is located outside of any known functional domain or repeat. 4/4 in silico tools predict benign outcome for this variant (SNP&GO was not used due to a low reliability index), however no experimental studies were published at the time of evaluation (ACMG BP4). The variant of interest has been identified in a large, broad control datasets of ExAC at a frequency of 0.0008 (99/121250 chrs tested), reaching the 0.0011 in several sub-populations (South Asians and European NF) including 1 homozygote. Although the observed frequency is similar to the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic LDLR variant (~0.001), thus supporting benign interpretation, the information on lipid profiling in these individuals is not available for individual review. The variant of interest was reported in multiple patients with elevated cholesterol level, including patient(s) carrying a known pathogenic variant APOB p.R3500Q (ACMG BP5), in whom lipid profiling results were not significantly different from data observed in patients carrying APOB R3500Q alone (Brusgaard, 2006) (ACMG BP5). In addition, per Dutch FH-database, cholesterol levels of R723Q positive and R723Q negative relatives are virtually similar (ACMG BS4), again favoring benign classification. The c.2231G>A was identified heterozygously in a healthy Caucasian adult undergoing carrier screening (ACMG BS2). Lastly, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as Benign/Likely Benign (ACMG BP6). Considering all evidence the variant was conservatively classified as Likely Benign until additional evidence supporting its presence in normolipedimic control subjects is obtained.ACMG Classification: BRationale for Pathogenicity: none. Rationale for being Benign: BS2, BS4, BP4, BP5; BP6 was not engaged due to discordant classifications. - |
Familial hypercholesterolemia Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 02, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 13, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at