19-1221306-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.828C>T(p.Gly276Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000155 in 1,610,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G276G) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000455.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial pancreatic carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- Peutz-Jeghers syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STK11 | NM_000455.5 | c.828C>T | p.Gly276Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 10 | ENST00000326873.12 | NP_000446.1 | |
| STK11 | NM_001407255.1 | c.828C>T | p.Gly276Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 9 | NP_001394184.1 | ||
| STK11 | NR_176325.1 | n.2095C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 7 of 11 | 
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STK11 | ENST00000326873.12 | c.828C>T | p.Gly276Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 10 | 1 | NM_000455.5 | ENSP00000324856.6 | ||
| STK11 | ENST00000652231.1 | c.828C>T | p.Gly276Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 9 | ENSP00000498804.1 | ||||
| STK11 | ENST00000585748.3 | c.456C>T | p.Gly152Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 8 of 12 | 3 | ENSP00000477641.2 | |||
| STK11 | ENST00000593219.6 | n.*653C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 7 of 11 | 3 | ENSP00000466610.1 | ||||
| STK11 | ENST00000593219.6 | n.*653C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 7 of 11 | 3 | ENSP00000466610.1 | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  0.0000263  AC: 4AN: 152208Hom.:  0  Cov.: 33 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.0000288  AC: 7AN: 242724 AF XY:  0.0000227   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.0000144  AC: 21AN: 1458120Hom.:  0  Cov.: 31 AF XY:  0.0000124  AC XY: 9AN XY: 725144 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome  0.0000263  AC: 4AN: 152326Hom.:  0  Cov.: 33 AF XY:  0.0000269  AC XY: 2AN XY: 74480 show subpopulations 
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome    Benign:5 
- -
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
- -
- -
This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
not provided    Benign:3 
- -
STK11: BP4, BP7 -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome    Benign:3 
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
not specified    Uncertain:1 
- -
STK11-related disorder    Benign:1 
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at