Variant 19-1226451-C-T details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.1109-3C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000807 in 1,609,960 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0002806

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.472

Variant links:

Genes affected

STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

STK11 links:

STK11 (HGNC:):

STK11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).

BP6

Variant 19-1226451-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1226451-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 219713.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr19-1226451-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 5 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STK11	NM_000455.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.1109-3C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant		ENST00000326873.12	NP_000446.1	Q15831-1A0A0S2Z4D1
STK11	NR_176325.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.2376-3C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
STK11	ENST00000326873.12 linkuse as main transcript	c.1109-3C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant		1	NM_000455.5	ENSP00000324856.6		Q15831-1
STK11	ENST00000585748.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.737-3C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant		3		ENSP00000477641.2		A0A087WT72

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000328

AC:

AN:

152232

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000121

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000549

AC:

AN:

1457728

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000828

AC XY:

AN XY:

724926

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000117

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000540

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000328

AC:

AN:

152232

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74378

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000121

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000642

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+	-	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Jun 25, 2020	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Nov 22, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Feb 19, 2021	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Apr 25, 2023	- -

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Jul 15, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Dec 09, 2023	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health	Nov 02, 2023	- -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Dec 26, 2017

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.78

CADD

Benign

2.6

DANN

Benign

0.82

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00028

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0040

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over