19-1226628-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 3P and 9B. PM1PP3BP6BS1BS2
The NM_000455.5(STK11):āc.1283C>Gā(p.Ser428Trp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000101 in 1,390,190 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S428S) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000455.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | NM_000455.5 | c.1283C>G | p.Ser428Trp | missense_variant | 9/10 | ENST00000326873.12 | NP_000446.1 | |
STK11 | NR_176325.1 | n.2550C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | ENST00000326873.12 | c.1283C>G | p.Ser428Trp | missense_variant | 9/10 | 1 | NM_000455.5 | ENSP00000324856.6 | ||
STK11 | ENST00000585748.3 | c.911C>G | p.Ser304Trp | missense_variant | 11/12 | 3 | ENSP00000477641.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000355 AC: 5AN: 140794Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000259 AC XY: 2AN XY: 77184
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000101 AC: 14AN: 1390190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000875 AC XY: 6AN XY: 685434
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Jul 20, 2022 | BS1 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 12, 2024 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with Lynch syndrome-associated cancer and/or polyps (PMID: 25980754); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30287823, 11297520, 23612973, 18321849, 28900777, 18854309, 18854318, 36243179, 25980754) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jul 12, 2024 | The STK11 c.1283C>G (p.Ser428Trp) variant has been reported in the published literature in an individual with Lynch syndrome-associated cancer and/or polyps (PMID: 25980754 (2015)) and in an individual with breast cancer (PMID: 35534704 (2022)). It has also been found in reportedly healthy individuals (PMIDs: 30287823 (2018) and 36243179 (2022)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00021 (5/23466 chromosomes in Admixed American subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 09, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 30, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 05, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 30, 2023 | Variant summary: STK11 c.1283C>G (p.Ser428Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 3.6e-05 in 140794 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1283C>G has been reported in the literature in an individual being evaluated for Lynch Syndrome (Yurgelun_2015). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 with conflicting assessments. Laboratories classified the variant as either likely benign (n=4) or VUS (n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 09, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at