19-12646579-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong

The ENST00000597692.1(ENSG00000269242):​n.*41C>T variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000389 in 1,459,372 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00041 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ENSG00000269242
ENST00000597692.1 non_coding_transcript_exon

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.60

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MAN2B1 (HGNC:6826): (mannosidase alpha class 2B member 1) This gene encodes an enzyme that hydrolyzes terminal, non-reducing alpha-D-mannose residues in alpha-D-mannosides. Its activity is necessary for the catabolism of N-linked carbohydrates released during glycoprotein turnover and it is member of family 38 of glycosyl hydrolases. The full length protein is processed in two steps. First, a 49 aa leader sequence is cleaved off and the remainder of the protein is processed into 3 peptides of 70 kDa, 42 kDa (D) and 13/15 kDa (E). Next, the 70 kDa peptide is further processed into three peptides (A, B and C). The A, B and C peptides are disulfide-linked. Defects in this gene have been associated with lysosomal alpha-mannosidosis. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]
MAN2B1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • alpha-mannosidosis
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Myriad Women’s Health, G2P, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MAN2B1NM_000528.4 linkc.*41C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 24 of 24 ENST00000456935.7 NP_000519.2 O00754-1
MAN2B1NM_001440570.1 linkc.*41C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 24 of 24 NP_001427499.1
MAN2B1NM_001173498.2 linkc.*41C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 24 of 24 NP_001166969.1 O00754-2A8K6A7
MAN2B1XM_047438841.1 linkc.*41C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 17 of 17 XP_047294797.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ENSG00000269242ENST00000597692.1 linkn.*41C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 5 2 ENSP00000470240.1 M0QZ24
MAN2B1ENST00000456935.7 linkc.*41C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 24 of 24 1 NM_000528.4 ENSP00000395473.2 O00754-1
ENSG00000269242ENST00000597692.1 linkn.*41C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 5 2 ENSP00000470240.1 M0QZ24

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000184
AC:
28
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000279
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000180
AC:
45
AN:
249440
AF XY:
0.000141
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000124
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000164
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000933
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000320
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000412
AC:
539
AN:
1307198
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
21
AF XY:
0.000394
AC XY:
259
AN XY:
658140
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000662
AC:
2
AN:
30230
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44392
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25202
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000770
AC:
3
AN:
38948
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000120
AC:
1
AN:
83074
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000150
AC:
8
AN:
53310
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5502
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000511
AC:
496
AN:
971174
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000524
AC:
29
AN:
55366
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
28
56
85
113
141
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
22
44
66
88
110
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000184
AC:
28
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000148
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74340
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000145
AC:
6
AN:
41426
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000655
AC:
1
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5194
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4836
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000188
AC:
2
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000279
AC:
19
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2090
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
3
5
6
8
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000215
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000223

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Deficiency of alpha-mannosidase Uncertain:1
Jan 15, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
0.095
DANN
Benign
0.47
PhyloP100
-2.6
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs371716069; hg19: chr19-12757393; API