19-12891342-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000159.4(GCDH):​c.38G>A​(p.Arg13His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000314 in 1,612,398 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

GCDH
NM_000159.4 missense

Scores

10
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.93
Variant links:
Genes affected
GCDH (HGNC:4189): (glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family. It catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of glutaryl-CoA to crotonyl-CoA and CO(2) in the degradative pathway of L-lysine, L-hydroxylysine, and L-tryptophan metabolism. It uses electron transfer flavoprotein as its electron acceptor. The enzyme exists in the mitochondrial matrix as a homotetramer of 45-kD subunits. Mutations in this gene result in the metabolic disorder glutaric aciduria type 1, which is also known as glutaric acidemia type I. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 12. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006339729).
BP6
Variant 19-12891342-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-12891342-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 735229.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GCDHNM_000159.4 linkc.38G>A p.Arg13His missense_variant Exon 2 of 12 ENST00000222214.10 NP_000150.1
GCDHNM_013976.5 linkc.38G>A p.Arg13His missense_variant Exon 2 of 12 NP_039663.1
GCDHNR_102316.1 linkn.146G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 12
GCDHNR_102317.1 linkn.146G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GCDHENST00000222214.10 linkc.38G>A p.Arg13His missense_variant Exon 2 of 12 1 NM_000159.4 ENSP00000222214.4 Q92947-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000217
AC:
33
AN:
152236
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00600
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000666
AC:
165
AN:
247620
AF XY:
0.000847
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000290
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000548
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000535
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000659
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000324
AC:
473
AN:
1460044
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000450
AC XY:
327
AN XY:
726508
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000598
AC:
2
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000224
AC:
1
AN:
44706
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26112
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00438
AC:
378
AN:
86236
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
51966
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000179
AC:
1
AN:
5576
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000477
AC:
53
AN:
1111928
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000630
AC:
38
AN:
60352
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
38
76
114
152
190
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000217
AC:
33
AN:
152354
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000349
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
74502
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000240
AC:
1
AN:
41592
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00600
AC:
29
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
2
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.452
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
3
5
6
8
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000104
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642
ExAC
AF:
0.000783
AC:
95
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glutaric aciduria, type 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Nov 16, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jun 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Aug 17, 2022
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Apr 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

GCDH: BS2 -

GCDH-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 06, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.19
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.050
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.43
T;.;T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.27
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.20
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.63
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
.;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.28
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0063
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.61
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.0
L;.;L;.;.
PhyloP100
1.9
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.49
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.64
N;.;.;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.40
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D;.;.;.;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.023
D;D;D;T;D
Polyphen
0.95
P;.;P;.;.
Vest4
0.32
MVP
0.96
MPC
0.64
ClinPred
0.098
T
GERP RS
3.9
PromoterAI
-0.0053
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.18
gMVP
0.71
Mutation Taster
=289/11
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar for variant 19:12891342 G>A . It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs550100640; hg19: chr19-13002156; API