19-16482548-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_145046.5(CALR3):c.820G>A(p.Val274Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0125 in 1,614,166 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,058 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_145046.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALR3 | NM_145046.5 | c.820G>A | p.Val274Ile | missense_variant | 7/9 | ENST00000269881.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALR3 | ENST00000269881.8 | c.820G>A | p.Val274Ile | missense_variant | 7/9 | 1 | NM_145046.5 | P1 | |
CALR3 | ENST00000602234.1 | n.494G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0267 AC: 4065AN: 152168Hom.: 136 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0347 AC: 8722AN: 251488Hom.: 752 AF XY: 0.0264 AC XY: 3586AN XY: 135922
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0110 AC: 16047AN: 1461880Hom.: 918 Cov.: 46 AF XY: 0.00986 AC XY: 7174AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0269 AC: 4089AN: 152286Hom.: 140 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0274 AC XY: 2041AN XY: 74462
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 19 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Oct 03, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 04, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 17, 2017 | Variant summary: The CALR3 c.820G>A (p.Val274Ile) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 in silico tools predict benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 3671/123152 control chromosomes (320 homozygotes) from ExAC and literature, predominantly observed in the Latino subpopulation at a frequency of 0.214458 (2483/11578). This frequency is about 8578 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CALR3 variant (0.000025), thus this is a common benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of Latino origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases in ClinVar have classified this variant as benign. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in affected individuals in literature. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 03, 2012 | General population or subpopulation frequency is too high to be a pathogenic mutation based on disease/syndrome prevalence and penetrance - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at