19-17816920-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM5BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting
The NM_001265587.2(INSL3):c.425C>T(p.Thr142Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000479 in 1,461,846 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T142S) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001265587.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cryptorchidismInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001265587.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSL3 | TSL:1 | c.425C>T | p.Thr142Ile | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000369017.4 | P51460-2 | ||
| INSL3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.330C>T | p.Asn110Asn | synonymous | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000321724.6 | P51460-1 | ||
| INSL3 | TSL:1 | c.*136C>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000469309.1 | M0QXQ3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251316 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461846Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 6AN XY: 727224 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at