19-33301415-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_004364.5(CEBPA):c.1000G>C(p.Glu334Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000657 in 152,244 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E334K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004364.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- acute myeloid leukemiaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEBPA | NM_004364.5 | c.1000G>C | p.Glu334Gln | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 1 | ENST00000498907.3 | NP_004355.2 | |
| CEBPA | NM_001287424.2 | c.1105G>C | p.Glu369Gln | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 1 | NP_001274353.1 | ||
| CEBPA | NM_001287435.2 | c.958G>C | p.Glu320Gln | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 1 | NP_001274364.1 | ||
| CEBPA | NM_001285829.2 | c.643G>C | p.Glu215Gln | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 1 | NP_001272758.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEBPA | ENST00000498907.3 | c.1000G>C | p.Glu334Gln | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 1 | 6 | NM_004364.5 | ENSP00000427514.1 | ||
| ENSG00000267727 | ENST00000587312.1 | n.137C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 2 | 3 | |||||
| ENSG00000267580 | ENST00000589932.1 | n.*247C>G | downstream_gene_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1459300Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726098 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74384 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The p.E334Q variant (also known as c.1000G>C), located in coding exon 1 of the CEBPA gene, results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 1000. The glutamic acid at codon 334 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is conserved. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -
Acute myeloid leukemia Uncertain:1
In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with CEBPA-related disease. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces glutamic acid with glutamine at codon 334 of the CEBPA protein (p.Glu334Gln). The glutamic acid residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between glutamic acid and glutamine. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at