19-33301848-GGGCGGCGGCGGC-GGGCGGCGGCGGCGGCGGC
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP3
The NM_004364.5(CEBPA):c.561_566dupGCCGCC(p.Pro188_Pro189dup) variant causes a disruptive inframe insertion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000687 in 1,310,760 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There is a variant allele frequency bias in the population database for this variant (GnomAdExome4), which may indicate mosaicism or somatic mutations in the reference population data. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P189P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004364.5 disruptive_inframe_insertion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEBPA | NM_004364.5 | c.561_566dupGCCGCC | p.Pro188_Pro189dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 1 | ENST00000498907.3 | NP_004355.2 | |
| CEBPA | NM_001287424.2 | c.666_671dupGCCGCC | p.Pro223_Pro224dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 1 | NP_001274353.1 | ||
| CEBPA | NM_001287435.2 | c.519_524dupGCCGCC | p.Pro174_Pro175dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 1 | NP_001274364.1 | ||
| CEBPA | NM_001285829.2 | c.204_209dupGCCGCC | p.Pro69_Pro70dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 1 | NP_001272758.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEBPA | ENST00000498907.3 | c.561_566dupGCCGCC | p.Pro188_Pro189dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 1 | 6 | NM_004364.5 | ENSP00000427514.1 | ||
| ENSG00000267727 | ENST00000587312.1 | n.406_411dupGGCGGC | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | 3 | |||||
| CEBPA-DT | ENST00000718467.1 | n.46+65_46+70dupGGCGGC | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000135 AC: 2AN: 148062Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000602 AC: 7AN: 1162698Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000704 AC XY: 4AN XY: 568584 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000135 AC: 2AN: 148062Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000139 AC XY: 1AN XY: 72100 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.561_566dupGCCGCC variant (also known as p.P188_P189dup), located in coding exon 1 of the CEBPA gene, results from an in-frame duplication of GCCGCC at nucleotide positions 561 to 566. This results in the duplication of 2 extra residues (PP) between codons 188 and 189. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear.
Acute myeloid leukemia Uncertain:1
This variant, c.561_566dup, results in the insertion of 2 amino acid(s) of the CEBPA protein (p.Pro188_Pro189dup), but otherwise preserves the integrity of the reading frame. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CEBPA-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 937708). Experimental studies and prediction algorithms are not available or were not evaluated, and the functional significance of this variant is currently unknown. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at