Menu
GeneBe

19-35337928-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong

The NM_001771.4(CD22):c.892G>A(p.Glu298Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0025 in 1,614,228 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0026 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

CD22
NM_001771.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.01
Variant links:
Genes affected
CD22 (HGNC:1643): (CD22 molecule) Predicted to enable CD4 receptor binding activity; protein phosphatase binding activity; and sialic acid binding activity. Involved in B cell activation; negative regulation of B cell receptor signaling pathway; and regulation of endocytosis. Located in early endosome and recycling endosome. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008769512).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CD22NM_001771.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.892G>A p.Glu298Lys missense_variant 5/14 ENST00000085219.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CD22ENST00000085219.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.892G>A p.Glu298Lys missense_variant 5/141 NM_001771.4 P2P20273-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00129
AC:
197
AN:
152236
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00151
AC:
379
AN:
251378
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00136
AC XY:
185
AN XY:
135858
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00298
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00262
AC:
3834
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00253
AC XY:
1843
AN XY:
727234
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000269
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00253
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000650
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000225
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00310
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00381
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00129
AC:
197
AN:
152354
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000966
AC XY:
72
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00213
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00154
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00243
AC:
9
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00285
AC:
11
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000908
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00279
AC:
24
ExAC
AF:
0.00140
AC:
170
EpiCase
AF:
0.00267
EpiControl
AF:
0.00166

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoMar 30, 2021CD22 NM_001771.3 exon 5 p.Glu298Lys (c.892G>A): This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 0.2% (104/35422) of Latino alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/19-35828831-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). This variant amino acid Lysine (Lys) is present in >10 species including mammals and is not well conserved among evolutionarily distant species; this suggests that this variant may not impact the protein. Additional computational prediction tools do not suggest an impact. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.071
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.65
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
Cadd
Benign
0.0010
Dann
Benign
0.65
Eigen
Benign
-1.9
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.020
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.58
T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0028
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0088
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.045
N;N;N;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.21
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.52
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.035
Sift
Benign
0.96
T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.86
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.13
.;B;.;.
Vest4
0.17
MVP
0.18
MPC
0.15
ClinPred
0.012
T
GERP RS
-10
Varity_R
0.077
gMVP
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138089449; hg19: chr19-35828831; COSMIC: COSV50059378; COSMIC: COSV50059378; API