19-35845551-G-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_004646.4(NPHS1):c.1758-11C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00883 in 1,611,298 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 109 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0077 ( 11 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0090 ( 98 hom. )
Consequence
NPHS1
NM_004646.4 intron
NM_004646.4 intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0007102
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0210
Genes affected
NPHS1 (HGNC:7908): (NPHS1 adhesion molecule, nephrin) This gene encodes a member of the immunoglobulin family of cell adhesion molecules that functions in the glomerular filtration barrier in the kidney. The gene is primarily expressed in renal tissues, and the protein is a type-1 transmembrane protein found at the slit diaphragm of glomerular podocytes. The slit diaphragm is thought to function as an ultrafilter to exclude albumin and other plasma macromolecules in the formation of urine. Mutations in this gene result in Finnish-type congenital nephrosis 1, characterized by severe proteinuria and loss of the slit diaphragm and foot processes.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 19-35845551-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-35845551-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 328868.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 11 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHS1 | NM_004646.4 | c.1758-11C>G | intron_variant | ENST00000378910.10 | NP_004637.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHS1 | ENST00000378910.10 | c.1758-11C>G | intron_variant | 1 | NM_004646.4 | ENSP00000368190.4 | ||||
NPHS1 | ENST00000353632.6 | c.1758-11C>G | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000343634.5 | |||||
NPHS1 | ENST00000585400.1 | n.-41C>G | upstream_gene_variant | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00769 AC: 1170AN: 152194Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1170
AN:
152194
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00730 AC: 1740AN: 238332Hom.: 13 AF XY: 0.00704 AC XY: 917AN XY: 130314
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1740
AN:
238332
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
917
AN XY:
130314
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00895 AC: 13062AN: 1458986Hom.: 98 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00870 AC XY: 6312AN XY: 725666
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
13062
AN:
1458986
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
6312
AN XY:
725666
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00769 AC: 1171AN: 152312Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00894 AC XY: 666AN XY: 74464
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1171
AN:
152312
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
666
AN XY:
74464
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2024 | NPHS1: BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 15, 2017 | Variant summary: The NPHS1 c.1758-11C>G variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide in the intronic region . One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 649/102412 control chromosomes (1 homozygote), predominantly observed in the European (Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.035667 (160/4486). This frequency is about 9 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic NPHS1 variant in Finnish population (0.0039, see calculation in additional comments), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Finnish) origin. This variant has been reported in a patient with end stage renal disease who also carries a pathogenic WT1 variant (c.1385G>A/p.Arg462Gln). Although one other clinical diagnostic laboratory classified this variant as uncertain significance, multiple lines of evidence support neutrality of this variant. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Congenital nephrotic syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at