19-35848707-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points: 6P and 1B. PM1PM5PP3_ModerateBP6
The NM_004646.4(NPHS1):c.1100G>A(p.Arg367His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,614,132 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R367C) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004646.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital nephrotic syndrome, Finnish typeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Myriad Women’s Health, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPHS1 | NM_004646.4 | c.1100G>A | p.Arg367His | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 29 | ENST00000378910.10 | NP_004637.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPHS1 | ENST00000378910.10 | c.1100G>A | p.Arg367His | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 29 | 1 | NM_004646.4 | ENSP00000368190.4 | ||
| NPHS1 | ENST00000353632.6 | c.1100G>A | p.Arg367His | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 28 | 5 | ENSP00000343634.5 | |||
| NPHS1 | ENST00000592132.1 | n.107G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 4 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152140Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251338 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461874Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727232 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152258Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74434 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Finnish congenital nephrotic syndrome Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
- -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: NPHS1 c.1100G>A (p.Arg367His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Immunoglobulin subtype domain (IPR003599) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. A different variant at the same codon, c.1099C>T (p.Arg367Cys) has been classified as Pathogenic supporting the functional relevance of this Arginine 367 residue to NPHS1 protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 251338 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1100G>A has been reported in the literature as a non-informative genotype (without a second allele, zygosity or clinical/family history), in a mutational update of Congenital Nephrotic Syndrome Causing Sequence Variants in NPHS1 (example, Beltcheva_2001, cited in Yang_2016). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Nephrotic Syndrome, Type 1. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 11317351, 20507940, 27019444). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 56422). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at