19-36101667-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001083961.2(WDR62):c.2975C>T(p.Ser992Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00193 in 1,550,406 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001083961.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00877 AC: 1334AN: 152168Hom.: 17 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00233 AC: 359AN: 154156Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00169 AC XY: 138AN XY: 81626
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00118 AC: 1652AN: 1398122Hom.: 16 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00105 AC XY: 722AN XY: 689614
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00876 AC: 1334AN: 152284Hom.: 17 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00841 AC XY: 626AN XY: 74460
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Microcephaly 2, primary, autosomal recessive, with or without cortical malformations Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
WDR62-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at