19-39504071-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_203486.3(DLL3):āc.653T>Cā(p.Leu218Pro) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.544 in 1,612,248 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 241,474 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_203486.3 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLL3 | NM_203486.3 | c.653T>C | p.Leu218Pro | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 5/9 | ENST00000356433.10 | NP_982353.1 | |
DLL3 | NM_016941.4 | c.653T>C | p.Leu218Pro | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 5/8 | NP_058637.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLL3 | ENST00000356433.10 | c.653T>C | p.Leu218Pro | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 5/9 | 2 | NM_203486.3 | ENSP00000348810 | P1 | |
DLL3 | ENST00000205143.4 | c.653T>C | p.Leu218Pro | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 5/8 | 1 | ENSP00000205143 | |||
DLL3 | ENST00000600437.1 | n.733T>C | splice_region_variant, non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/6 | 1 | |||||
DLL3 | ENST00000596614.5 | c.410-2968T>C | intron_variant | 2 | ENSP00000471688 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.594 AC: 90304AN: 151990Hom.: 27494 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.563 AC: 140647AN: 249764Hom.: 40018 AF XY: 0.562 AC XY: 75896AN XY: 135162
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.539 AC: 787206AN: 1460140Hom.: 213939 Cov.: 47 AF XY: 0.541 AC XY: 393009AN XY: 726490
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.594 AC: 90397AN: 152108Hom.: 27535 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.599 AC XY: 44566AN XY: 74354
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 21, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Spondylocostal dysostosis 1, autosomal recessive Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Syndactyly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at