19-40611980-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001042545.2(LTBP4):​c.2175C>T​(p.Cys725Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00158 in 1,611,810 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0089 ( 19 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00083 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

LTBP4
NM_001042545.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.480

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LTBP4 (HGNC:6717): (latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 4) The protein encoded by this gene binds transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) as it is secreted and targeted to the extracellular matrix. TGFB is biologically latent after secretion and insertion into the extracellular matrix, and sheds TGFB and other proteins upon activation. Defects in this gene may be a cause of cutis laxa and severe pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and urinary abnormalities. Three transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]
LTBP4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • cutis laxa with severe pulmonary, gastrointestinal and urinary anomalies
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 19-40611980-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-40611980-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 226720.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00886 (1348/152182) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0315 (1306/41510). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.03. There are 19 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 617 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 19 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LTBP4NM_001042545.2 linkc.2175C>T p.Cys725Cys synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 30 ENST00000396819.8 NP_001036010.1
LTBP4NM_001042544.1 linkc.2376C>T p.Cys792Cys synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 33 NP_001036009.1
LTBP4NM_003573.2 linkc.2265C>T p.Cys755Cys synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 33 NP_003564.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LTBP4ENST00000396819.8 linkc.2175C>T p.Cys725Cys synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 30 1 NM_001042545.2 ENSP00000380031.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00886
AC:
1347
AN:
152064
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0315
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00383
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00192
AC:
473
AN:
245904
AF XY:
0.00148
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0294
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000671
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000223
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000268
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000668
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000826
AC:
1205
AN:
1459628
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
56
AF XY:
0.000708
AC XY:
514
AN XY:
725968
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0310
AC:
1037
AN:
33408
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000854
AC:
38
AN:
44486
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25966
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000101
AC:
4
AN:
39602
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000815
AC:
7
AN:
85882
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53350
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000695
AC:
4
AN:
5756
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000144
AC:
16
AN:
1110904
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00164
AC:
99
AN:
60274
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.466
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
63
125
188
250
313
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
36
72
108
144
180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00886
AC:
1348
AN:
152182
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00829
AC XY:
617
AN XY:
74396
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0315
AC:
1306
AN:
41510
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00170
AC:
26
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000208
AC:
1
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000103
AC:
7
AN:
67994
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00379
AC:
8
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
70
140
211
281
351
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00486
Hom.:
6
Bravo
AF:
0.00991
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Feb 21, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cys792Cys in exon 17 of LTBP4: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 2.7% (112/4186) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs141810975).

Nov 25, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Cutis laxa with severe pulmonary, gastrointestinal and urinary anomalies Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

not provided Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

LTBP4-related disorder Benign:1
Oct 16, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.94
PhyloP100
0.48
PromoterAI
0.00020
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=85/15
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.44
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
0.44
Position offset: -2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141810975; hg19: chr19-41117886; API