19-41386676-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_020158.4(EXOSC5):c.665G>T(p.Arg222Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000482 in 1,451,924 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R222H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020158.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cerebellar ataxia, brain abnormalities, and cardiac conduction defectsInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_020158.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXOSC5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.665G>T | p.Arg222Leu | missense | Exon 6 of 6 | ENSP00000221233.3 | Q9NQT4 | ||
| ENSG00000255730 | TSL:2 | c.210+8157C>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000443246.1 | F5H5P2 | |||
| EXOSC5 | TSL:3 | c.731G>T | p.Arg244Leu | missense | Exon 7 of 7 | ENSP00000471557.2 | M0R102 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000482 AC: 7AN: 1451924Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000555 AC XY: 4AN XY: 721210 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at