19-46755585-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_024301.5(FKRP):c.135C>T(p.Ala45=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.143 in 1,604,888 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16,633 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.14 ( 1588 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.14 ( 15045 hom. )
Consequence
FKRP
NM_024301.5 synonymous
NM_024301.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.496
Genes affected
FKRP (HGNC:17997): (fukutin related protein) This gene encodes a protein which is targeted to the medial Golgi apparatus and is necessary for posttranslational modification of dystroglycan. Mutations in this gene have been associated with congenital muscular dystrophy, cognitive disability, and cerebellar cysts. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants of this gene have been described, but the full-length nature of some of these variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
Variant 19-46755585-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-46755585-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 96105.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-46755585-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr19-46755585-C-T is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic]. Variant chr19-46755585-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.496 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.166 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKRP | NM_024301.5 | c.135C>T | p.Ala45= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000318584.10 | NP_077277.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKRP | ENST00000318584.10 | c.135C>T | p.Ala45= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_024301.5 | ENSP00000326570 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.141 AC: 21466AN: 152140Hom.: 1583 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
21466
AN:
152140
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.142 AC: 32843AN: 230836Hom.: 2335 AF XY: 0.143 AC XY: 18006AN XY: 125774
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
32843
AN:
230836
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
18006
AN XY:
125774
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.143 AC: 208019AN: 1452630Hom.: 15045 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.144 AC XY: 103902AN XY: 722134
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
208019
AN:
1452630
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
103902
AN XY:
722134
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.141 AC: 21484AN: 152258Hom.: 1588 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.138 AC XY: 10281AN XY: 74444
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
21484
AN:
152258
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
10281
AN XY:
74444
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
549
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:9
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 04, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 31, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 13, 2015 | p.Ala45Ala in exon 4 of FKRP: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 14.2% (625/4398) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2287717). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 11, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2I Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Phosphorus, Inc. | Aug 01, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 28, 2017 | - - |
Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy type B5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 10, 2021 | - - |
Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with brain and eye anomalies), type A5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 10, 2021 | - - |
Dystrophin deficiency Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 21, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Walker-Warburg congenital muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at