19-47822000-C-T

Variant names:

• chr19-47822000-C-T
• rs755040084
• ENST00000556527.1:n.67C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_Strong BS1_Supporting

The ENST00000556527.1(CRX):​n.67C>T variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000217 in 152,188 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 (0 hom.)
  • Failed GnomAD Quality Control
• Consequence: CRX ENST00000556527.1 non_coding_transcript_exon
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:3
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.731
• Publications: 0 publications found

Genes affected

CRX (HGNC:2383): (cone-rod homeobox) The protein encoded by this gene is a photoreceptor-specific transcription factor which plays a role in the differentiation of photoreceptor cells. This homeodomain protein is necessary for the maintenance of normal cone and rod function. Mutations in this gene are associated with photoreceptor degeneration, Leber congenital amaurosis type III and the autosomal dominant cone-rod dystrophy 2. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants of this gene have been described, but the full-length nature of some variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CRX Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

• cone-rod dystrophy 2

  Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
• hereditary macular dystrophy

  Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
• Leber congenital amaurosis 7

  Inheritance: AD, AR, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
• cone-rod dystrophy

  Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• Leber congenital amaurosis

  Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• retinitis pigmentosa

  Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

ACMG classification

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000217 (33/152188) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00203 (31/15278). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00147. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 23 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CRX	NM_000554.6	c.-46C>T		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 4	ENST00000221996.12	NP_000545.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CRX	ENST00000221996.12	c.-46C>T		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 4	2	NM_000554.6	ENSP00000221996.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000217 AC: 33 AN: 152188 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00203

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 548 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0 AN XY: 344

African (AFR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 6

American (AMR) AC: 0 AN: 0

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AC: 0 AN: 0

East Asian (EAS) AC: 0 AN: 0

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 4

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 436

Middle Eastern (MID) AC: 0 AN: 0

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 88

Other (OTH) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 14

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000217 AC: 33 AN: 152188 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000309 AC XY: 23 AN XY: 74350

African (AFR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 41442

American (AMR) AF: 0.00203 AC: 31 AN: 15278

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 3472

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 5190

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 4826

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 10624

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 316

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.0000294 AC: 2 AN: 68038

Other (OTH) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 2090

Alfa AF: 0.00 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000193

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Cone-rod dystrophy 2 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Leber congenital amaurosis 7 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.63
CADD	Benign	6.4
DANN	Benign	0.93
PhyloP100		-0.73
PromoterAI		0.019	Neutral

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs755040084; hg19: chr19-48325257;