19-47834471-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 4P and 9B. PM1PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_000554.6(CRX):ā€‹c.28C>Gā€‹(p.His10Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0006 in 1,614,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00058 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00060 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CRX
NM_000554.6 missense

Scores

1
9
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.83
Variant links:
Genes affected
CRX (HGNC:2383): (cone-rod homeobox) The protein encoded by this gene is a photoreceptor-specific transcription factor which plays a role in the differentiation of photoreceptor cells. This homeodomain protein is necessary for the maintenance of normal cone and rod function. Mutations in this gene are associated with photoreceptor degeneration, Leber congenital amaurosis type III and the autosomal dominant cone-rod dystrophy 2. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants of this gene have been described, but the full-length nature of some variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

PM1
In a chain Cone-rod homeobox protein (size 298) in uniprot entity CRX_HUMAN there are 37 pathogenic changes around while only 5 benign (88%) in NM_000554.6
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.035576344).
BP6
Variant 19-47834471-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-47834471-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 329693.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr19-47834471-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000578 (88/152260) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00131 (20/15286). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000866. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 39 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CRXNM_000554.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.28C>G p.His10Asp missense_variant 2/4 ENST00000221996.12 NP_000545.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CRXENST00000221996.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.28C>G p.His10Asp missense_variant 2/42 NM_000554.6 ENSP00000221996 P1
CRXENST00000556527.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.78-1772C>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 1
CRXENST00000566686.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.28C>G p.His10Asp missense_variant 2/35 ENSP00000457808
CRXENST00000613299.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.28C>G p.His10Asp missense_variant 2/33 ENSP00000478106

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000585
AC:
89
AN:
152142
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00138
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000853
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000958
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000489
AC:
123
AN:
251478
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000537
AC XY:
73
AN XY:
135914
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000490
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000545
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000603
AC:
881
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000601
AC XY:
437
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000149
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000336
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000674
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000729
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000578
AC:
88
AN:
152260
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000524
AC XY:
39
AN XY:
74448
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000144
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000853
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000948
Alfa
AF:
0.000497
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000604
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00108
AC:
4
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000581
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
0.000412
AC:
50
EpiCase
AF:
0.000600
EpiControl
AF:
0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The CRX p.His10Asp variant was identified in the literature in individuals with retinitis pigmentosa and bipolar disorder (Sohocki_2001_PMID:11139241; Maaser_2018_PMID_11139241; Jespersgaard_2019_PMID:30718709). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs139340178) and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Illumina and Invitae, and as uncertain significance by CeGaT Praxis fuer Humangenetik Tuebingen and Medical Genetics Laboratory, Kennedy Center,Juliane Marie Center, Rigshospitalet). The variant was identified in control databases in 133 of 282854 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0004702 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 41 of 35432 chromosomes (freq: 0.001157), Other in 4 of 7228 chromosomes (freq: 0.000553), European (non-Finnish) in 69 of 129186 chromosomes (freq: 0.000534), South Asian in 15 of 30616 chromosomes (freq: 0.00049), African in 3 of 24950 chromosomes (freq: 0.00012) and European (Finnish) in 1 of 25118 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or East Asian populations. The p.His10 residue is conserved across mammals and other organisms, and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 19, 2018See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletApr 01, 2018- -
Leber congenital amaurosis 7 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Cone-rod dystrophy 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Leber congenital amaurosis 7;C3489532:Cone-rod dystrophy 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 25, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.46
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.097
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.040
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.22
.;T;T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.32
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.35
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.79
T;.;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.11
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.036
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.047
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.97
.;L;L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.79
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.4
N;N;N;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.49
Sift
Benign
0.58
T;T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.18
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.96
.;D;D;.
Vest4
0.57, 0.55, 0.81
MVP
0.88
MPC
0.57
ClinPred
0.075
T
GERP RS
4.0
Varity_R
0.29
gMVP
0.71

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139340178; hg19: chr19-48337728; API