19-49035626-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_033377.2(CGB1):c.452G>C(p.Arg151Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,459,780 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_033377.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGB1 | ENST00000301407.8 | c.452G>C | p.Arg151Pro | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | 1 | NM_033377.2 | ENSP00000301407.6 | ||
ENSG00000267335 | ENST00000591656.1 | c.-28+900G>C | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 2 | 2 | ENSP00000466140.1 | ||||
ENSG00000267335 | ENST00000604577.1 | c.9+1077G>C | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 2 | 1 | ENSP00000474022.1 | ||||
CGB1 | ENST00000601167.1 | c.*27G>C | downstream_gene_variant | 5 | ENSP00000472896.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 27
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000797 AC: 2AN: 250964Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135814
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1459780Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726186
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 27
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.452G>C (p.R151P) alteration is located in exon 3 (coding exon 3) of the CGB1 gene. This alteration results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 452, causing the arginine (R) at amino acid position 151 to be replaced by a proline (P). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at