19-49829862-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4BP6BS1
The NM_030973.4(MED25):c.602C>T(p.Pro201Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000124 in 1,612,804 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 10/14 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P201T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030973.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital cataract-microcephaly-nevus flammeus simplex-severe intellectual disability syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal recessive non-syndromic intellectual disabilityInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2B2Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MED25 | ENST00000312865.10 | c.602C>T | p.Pro201Leu | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 18 | 1 | NM_030973.4 | ENSP00000326767.5 | ||
| MED25 | ENST00000595185.5 | c.602C>T | p.Pro201Leu | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 7 | 1 | ENSP00000470027.1 | |||
| MED25 | ENST00000538643.5 | c.181-649C>T | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 12 | 1 | ENSP00000437496.1 | ||||
| MED25 | ENST00000593767.3 | c.602C>T | p.Pro201Leu | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 18 | 3 | ENSP00000470692.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000513 AC: 78AN: 152126Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000240 AC: 59AN: 246284 AF XY: 0.000224 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000828 AC: 121AN: 1460560Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000716 AC XY: 52AN XY: 726626 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000519 AC: 79AN: 152244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000457 AC XY: 34AN XY: 74444 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 201 of the MED25 protein (p.Pro201Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs144354024, gnomAD 0.2%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MED25-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 543216). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at