19-50407153-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_002691.4(POLD1):c.1665C>T(p.Val555Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000979 in 1,607,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00057 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 4 hom. )
Consequence
POLD1
NM_002691.4 synonymous
NM_002691.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.54
Genes affected
POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 19-50407153-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50407153-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 239248.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-50407153-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.54 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 87 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLD1 | NM_002691.4 | c.1665C>T | p.Val555Val | synonymous_variant | 13/27 | ENST00000440232.7 | NP_002682.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLD1 | ENST00000440232.7 | c.1665C>T | p.Val555Val | synonymous_variant | 13/27 | 1 | NM_002691.4 | ENSP00000406046.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000572 AC: 87AN: 152162Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
87
AN:
152162
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000783 AC: 194AN: 247632Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000858 AC XY: 115AN XY: 134024
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
194
AN:
247632
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
115
AN XY:
134024
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00102 AC: 1487AN: 1455658Hom.: 4 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00107 AC XY: 776AN XY: 723070
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1487
AN:
1455658
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
776
AN XY:
723070
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000571 AC: 87AN: 152278Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000497 AC XY: 37AN XY: 74456
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
87
AN:
152278
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
74456
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Apr 30, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 30, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 28, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 07, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | POLD1: BP4, BP7, BS1 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 26, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Apr 06, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 01, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 18, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The POLD1 p.Val555= variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs150238541) as “with likely benign allele” and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, True Health Diagnostics and 2 other submitters; and as benign by Invitae and Prevention Genetics). The variant was identified in control databases in 206 of 279,020 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0007 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: South Asian in 43 of 30,490 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European in 142 of 126,522 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Other in 4 of 7138 chromosomes (freq: 0.0006), Finnish in 13 of 24,740 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10,192 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), African in 2 of 24,900 chromosomes (freq: 0.00008), and Latino in 1 of 35,130 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), while it was not observed in the East Asian population. The p.Val555= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs at a non-highly conserved nucleotide outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at