19-50408800-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_002691.4(POLD1):c.1791C>T(p.Pro597Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,613,824 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000019 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
POLD1
NM_002691.4 synonymous
NM_002691.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.324
Genes affected
POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).
BP6
Variant 19-50408800-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50408800-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 469220.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.324 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 28 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLD1 | NM_002691.4 | c.1791C>T | p.Pro597Pro | synonymous_variant | 15/27 | ENST00000440232.7 | NP_002682.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLD1 | ENST00000440232.7 | c.1791C>T | p.Pro597Pro | synonymous_variant | 15/27 | 1 | NM_002691.4 | ENSP00000406046.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152228
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251156Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135764
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
251156
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135764
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000192 AC: 28AN: 1461596Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000206 AC XY: 15AN XY: 727120
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
1461596
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
727120
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74374
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152228
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74374
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 08, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 09, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The POLD1 p.Pro11= variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs3218768) as "With Benign allele ", ClinVar (4x as benign by Invitae, GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano), and LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 937 of 261746 chromosomes (25 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.004, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: East Asian in 913 of 18194 chromosomes (freq: 0.05), Other in 10 of 6104 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Latino in 4 of 33324 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), European in 2 of 118794 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), and South Asian in 8 of 29432 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003); it was not observed in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, or Finnish populations. The p.Pro11= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 12, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 18, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at