19-5908961-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001017921.4(VMAC):c.329G>A(p.Arg110His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000732 in 1,612,674 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001017921.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMAC | ENST00000339485.4 | c.329G>A | p.Arg110His | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | 1 | NM_001017921.4 | ENSP00000343348.2 | ||
ENSG00000267314 | ENST00000588891.1 | n.191+3880G>A | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 3 | 4 | ENSP00000468419.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000326 AC: 8AN: 245532 AF XY: 0.0000374 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000733 AC: 107AN: 1460498Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000729 AC XY: 53AN XY: 726592 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74348 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.329G>A (p.R110H) alteration is located in exon 2 (coding exon 2) of the VMAC gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 329, causing the arginine (R) at amino acid position 110 to be replaced by a histidine (H). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at