19-6678019-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 1P and 11B. PP2BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000064.4(C3):ā€‹c.4855A>Cā€‹(p.Ser1619Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00193 in 1,613,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0014 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0020 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

C3
NM_000064.4 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.709
Variant links:
Genes affected
C3 (HGNC:1318): (complement C3) Complement component C3 plays a central role in the activation of complement system. Its activation is required for both classical and alternative complement activation pathways. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that form the mature protein, which is then further processed to generate numerous peptide products. The C3a peptide, also known as the C3a anaphylatoxin, modulates inflammation and possesses antimicrobial activity. Mutations in this gene are associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and age-related macular degeneration in human patients. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), C3. . Gene score misZ 2.7489 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 4.431 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with complement component 3 deficiency, C3 glomerulonephritis, atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with C3 anomaly.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06986827).
BP6
Variant 19-6678019-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-6678019-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 330271.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=4, Benign=1}. Variant chr19-6678019-T-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00136 (207/152078) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00252 (171/67980). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00221. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 95 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
C3NM_000064.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4855A>C p.Ser1619Arg missense_variant 41/41 ENST00000245907.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
C3ENST00000245907.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.4855A>C p.Ser1619Arg missense_variant 41/411 NM_000064.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00136
AC:
207
AN:
151960
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000362
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000984
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000866
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00252
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00118
AC:
298
AN:
251478
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00116
AC XY:
157
AN XY:
135916
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000781
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000198
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000924
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00199
AC:
2916
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00192
AC XY:
1399
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000760
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000230
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000150
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00250
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00113
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00136
AC:
207
AN:
152078
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00128
AC XY:
95
AN XY:
74336
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000361
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000983
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000866
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00252
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000475
Alfa
AF:
0.00207
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00149
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00189
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00208
AC:
8
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00113
AC:
5
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00279
AC:
24
ExAC
AF:
0.00110
AC:
133
EpiCase
AF:
0.00202
EpiControl
AF:
0.00219

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 18, 2019Published functional studies demonstrate no significant impact on expression, secretion, hemolytic activity or other functional properties (Mohlin et al., 2018); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23847193, 30131807, 29888403, 24029428, 24736606, 28852487, 28911789, 27939104, 27013439, 26638553) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2023C3: BP4 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Complement component 3 deficiency Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsMar 01, 2018This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoDec 17, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 22, 2023Variant summary: C3 c.4855A>C (p.Ser1619Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Netrin domain (IPR001134) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0019 in 1613968 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0025 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. c.4855A>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (Bu_2014, Feng_2013), Glomerulopathy (Haydock_2022) and recurrent pregnancy loss (Mohlin_2018) without evidence for causality. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Mohlin_2018). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 24029428, 23847193, 34714369, 30131807). Nine submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014and classified as benign/likely benign (n=5) and VUS (n=4). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Age related macular degeneration 9;C2752037:Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with C3 anomaly;C3151071:Complement component 3 deficiency Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoMar 30, 2021C3 NM_000064.3 exon 41 p.Ser1619Arg (c.4855A>C): This variant has been reported in the literature in at least 1 individual with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) (Feng 2013 PMID:23847193, Bu 2014 PMID:24029428) as well as recurrent pregnancy loss (Mohlin 2018 PMID:30131807). This variant has also been reported in individuals with age-related macular degeneration; however, at least 1 of these publications suggest that this variant may not be associated with this presentation (Duvvari 2014 PMID:24736606, Geerlings 2018 PMID:29888403). This variant is present in 0.2% (278/129150) of European alleles including 1 homozygote in the Genome Aggregation Database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/19-6678030-T-G?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:330271). This variant amino acid Arginine (Arg) is present in 4 species (Squirrel, Pika, Ferret, Cavefish) and is not well conserved among evolutionarily distant species; this suggests that this variant may not impact the protein. Additional computational prediction tools do not suggest an impact. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -
C3-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJul 02, 2024The C3 c.4855A>C variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ser1619Arg. This variant has been reported in individuals in the heterozygous state, and along with the CFH c.3583G>T (p.Glu1195X) variant, with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (Supplemental Table 2, Patient 11, Bu et al. 2013. PubMed ID: 24029428; Patient ID MA-7, Feng et al. 2013. PubMed ID: 23847193; Dowen et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28852487; Table S3, Geerlings et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 29888403; Huerta et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 28911789). This variant has also been reported in the heterozygous state in individuals with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (Duvvari et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 24736606; Huerta et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 28911789, Table S3, Geerlings et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 29888403) and in an individual with spontaneous pregnancy loss (Mohlin et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 30131807). Of note, this variant was also reported in control populations (Duvvari et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 24736606; Huerta et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 28911789; Mohlin et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 30131807). This variant is reported in 0.22% of alleles in individuals, including one homozygote, of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD and has conflicting interpretations regarding it pathogenicity in ClinVar, ranging from uncertain significance to likely benign to benign (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/330271/). While this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Age related macular degeneration 9 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with C3 anomaly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.24
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.56
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.12
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.39
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.43
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.32
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.63
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.074
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.070
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M
MutationTaster
Benign
0.95
N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.50
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.7
N
REVEL
Benign
0.051
Sift
Benign
0.097
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.15
T
Polyphen
0.83
P
Vest4
0.67
MutPred
0.35
Loss of methylation at K1615 (P = 0.0641);
MVP
0.57
MPC
0.74
ClinPred
0.020
T
GERP RS
4.0
Varity_R
0.45
gMVP
0.83

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2230210; hg19: chr19-6678030; API