19-6718523-T-C
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000064.4(C3):c.268-111A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.277 in 1,340,566 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 52,315 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.25 ( 5026 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.28 ( 47289 hom. )
Consequence
C3
NM_000064.4 intron
NM_000064.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0330
Publications
53 publications found
Genes affected
C3 (HGNC:1318): (complement C3) Complement component C3 plays a central role in the activation of complement system. Its activation is required for both classical and alternative complement activation pathways. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that form the mature protein, which is then further processed to generate numerous peptide products. The C3a peptide, also known as the C3a anaphylatoxin, modulates inflammation and possesses antimicrobial activity. Mutations in this gene are associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and age-related macular degeneration in human patients. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
C3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with C3 anomalyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- complement component 3 deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
- C3 glomerulonephritisInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 19-6718523-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-6718523-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 1276044.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.277 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3 | NM_000064.4 | c.268-111A>G | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 40 | ENST00000245907.11 | NP_000055.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3 | ENST00000245907.11 | c.268-111A>G | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 40 | 1 | NM_000064.4 | ENSP00000245907.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.255 AC: 38684AN: 151744Hom.: 5033 Cov.: 30 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
38684
AN:
151744
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.280 AC: 332843AN: 1188704Hom.: 47289 AF XY: 0.278 AC XY: 166140AN XY: 597310 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
332843
AN:
1188704
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
166140
AN XY:
597310
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
5595
AN:
28104
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
9723
AN:
40788
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
6285
AN:
22898
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
8643
AN:
37906
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
18403
AN:
77966
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
16245
AN:
49540
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
1323
AN:
5124
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
252549
AN:
875390
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
14077
AN:
50988
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.514
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12433
24866
37298
49731
62164
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
7824
15648
23472
31296
39120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.255 AC: 38701AN: 151862Hom.: 5026 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.257 AC XY: 19108AN XY: 74212 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
38701
AN:
151862
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
19108
AN XY:
74212
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
8289
AN:
41394
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
3663
AN:
15262
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
976
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
1247
AN:
5146
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
1069
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
3575
AN:
10536
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
58
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
19028
AN:
67930
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
576
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1459
2918
4377
5836
7295
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
408
816
1224
1632
2040
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
989
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided
- -
Jun 18, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.