19-8369213-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 2P and 12B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_139314.3(ANGPTL4):c.548-6C>T variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000221 in 1,608,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_139314.3 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGPTL4 | NM_139314.3 | c.548-6C>T | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000301455.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGPTL4 | ENST00000301455.7 | c.548-6C>T | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_139314.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000598 AC: 91AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000317 AC: 77AN: 242972Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000298 AC XY: 39AN XY: 130842
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000181 AC: 264AN: 1455870Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000178 AC XY: 129AN XY: 723664
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000604 AC: 92AN: 152292Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000577 AC XY: 43AN XY: 74462
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 12, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at