19-917549-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_032551.5(KISS1R):​c.47C>T​(p.Pro16Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000618 in 1,520,542 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000065 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

KISS1R
NM_032551.5 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.28
Variant links:
Genes affected
KISS1R (HGNC:4510): (KISS1 receptor) The protein encoded by this gene is a galanin-like G protein-coupled receptor that binds metastin, a peptide encoded by the metastasis suppressor gene KISS1. The tissue distribution of the expressed gene suggests that it is involved in the regulation of endocrine function, and this is supported by the finding that this gene appears to play a role in the onset of puberty. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and central precocious puberty. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0393658).
BP6
Variant 19-917549-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-917549-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 2085659.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000065 (89/1368236) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00461 (23/4994). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00315. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 51 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
KISS1RNM_032551.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.47C>T p.Pro16Leu missense_variant 1/5 ENST00000234371.10
KISS1RXM_047439545.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.47C>T p.Pro16Leu missense_variant 1/4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
KISS1RENST00000234371.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.47C>T p.Pro16Leu missense_variant 1/51 NM_032551.5 P1
KISS1RENST00000606939.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.47C>T p.Pro16Leu missense_variant 1/45
KISS1RENST00000592648.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.47C>T p.Pro16Leu missense_variant 1/25

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152192
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000737
AC:
9
AN:
122058
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000898
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
66780
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000439
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000150
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000271
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000650
AC:
89
AN:
1368236
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000757
AC XY:
51
AN XY:
673904
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000272
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000389
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000346
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000281
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000328
AC:
5
AN:
152306
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000174
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000491
ExAC
AF:
0.0000305
AC:
3

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJun 16, 2022This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with KISS1R-related conditions. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The leucine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. This variant is present in population databases (rs756986700, gnomAD 0.01%). This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 16 of the KISS1R protein (p.Pro16Leu). -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityJul 06, 2022- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 09, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.059
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.48
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
0.19
DANN
Benign
0.92
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.3
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.059
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.68
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.056
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.039
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.29
.;N;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.70
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.35
.;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.054
Sift
Benign
1.0
.;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.21
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0020
.;B;.
Vest4
0.042, 0.046
MutPred
0.29
Loss of disorder (P = 0.0162);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0162);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0162);
MVP
0.56
MPC
0.91
ClinPred
0.029
T
GERP RS
-3.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.020
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs756986700; hg19: chr19-917549; API