2-11787112-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001349206.2(LPIN1):​c.1588G>A​(p.Val530Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0174 in 1,613,934 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 342 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.017 ( 34 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.017 ( 308 hom. )

Consequence

LPIN1
NM_001349206.2 missense

Scores

2
8
8

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.37

Publications

16 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LPIN1 (HGNC:13345): (lipin 1) This gene encodes a magnesium-ion-dependent phosphatidic acid phosphohydrolase enzyme that catalyzes the penultimate step in triglyceride synthesis including the dephosphorylation of phosphatidic acid to yield diacylglycerol. Expression of this gene is required for adipocyte differentiation and it also functions as a nuclear transcriptional coactivator with some peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors to modulate expression of other genes involved in lipid metabolism. Mutations in this gene are associated with metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, acute recurrent rhabdomyolysis, and autosomal recessive acute recurrent myoglobinuria (ARARM). This gene is also a candidate for several human lipodystrophy syndromes. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2017]
LPIN1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • myoglobinuria, acute recurrent, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia
  • hereditary recurrent myoglobinuria
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00783357).
BP6
Variant 2-11787112-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-11787112-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 262583.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0167 (2548/152302) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.024 (1635/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0231. There are 34 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1227 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 34 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LPIN1NM_001349206.2 linkc.1588G>A p.Val530Met missense_variant Exon 11 of 21 ENST00000674199.1 NP_001336135.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LPIN1ENST00000674199.1 linkc.1588G>A p.Val530Met missense_variant Exon 11 of 21 NM_001349206.2 ENSP00000501331.1 Q14693-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0167
AC:
2549
AN:
152184
Hom.:
34
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00384
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0144
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0268
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00310
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0357
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0240
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0201
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0164
AC:
4122
AN:
251410
AF XY:
0.0165
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00326
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0146
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0294
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0317
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0209
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0174
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0175
AC:
25561
AN:
1461632
Hom.:
308
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0174
AC XY:
12657
AN XY:
727144
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00293
AC:
98
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0142
AC:
637
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0283
AC:
740
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
3
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00330
AC:
285
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0326
AC:
1742
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0184
AC:
106
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0188
AC:
20944
AN:
1111776
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0167
AC:
1006
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.468
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1222
2444
3667
4889
6111
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
698
1396
2094
2792
3490
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0167
AC:
2548
AN:
152302
Hom.:
34
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0165
AC XY:
1227
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00382
AC:
159
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0144
AC:
221
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0268
AC:
93
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00310
AC:
15
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0357
AC:
379
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0136
AC:
4
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0240
AC:
1635
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0194
AC:
41
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
126
252
377
503
629
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
32
64
96
128
160
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0195
Hom.:
122
Bravo
AF:
0.0135
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0162
AC:
60
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0205
AC:
79
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00499
AC:
22
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0221
AC:
190
ExAC
AF:
0.0157
AC:
1903
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0219
EpiControl
AF:
0.0219

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Nov 16, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myoglobinuria, acute recurrent, autosomal recessive Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nov 29, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.17
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.28
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.16
.;.;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.47
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.53
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0078
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.26
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
2.9
.;.;.;M
PhyloP100
4.4
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.5
N;N;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.19
Sift
Uncertain
0.012
D;D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.032
D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.24
.;.;.;B
Vest4
0.21
MPC
0.51
ClinPred
0.035
T
GERP RS
5.6
PromoterAI
-0.022
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.17
gMVP
0.38
Mutation Taster
=298/2
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs33997857; hg19: chr2-11927238; COSMIC: COSV107217698; COSMIC: COSV107217698; API