2-118969240-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_006770.4(MARCO):c.178G>C(p.Ala60Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00103 in 1,614,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A60T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006770.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006770.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARCO | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.178G>C | p.Ala60Pro | missense | Exon 2 of 17 | ENSP00000318916.4 | Q9UEW3-1 | ||
| MARCO | c.178G>C | p.Ala60Pro | missense | Exon 2 of 18 | ENSP00000544416.1 | ||||
| MARCO | c.178G>C | p.Ala60Pro | missense | Exon 2 of 17 | ENSP00000628889.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000578 AC: 88AN: 152242Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00227 AC: 570AN: 251378 AF XY: 0.00313 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00108 AC: 1579AN: 1461758Hom.: 24 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00159 AC XY: 1157AN XY: 727200 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000571 AC: 87AN: 152360Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000805 AC XY: 60AN XY: 74496 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at