2-126690265-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP7
The NM_002101.5(GYPC):c.60G>C(p.Pro20Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000685 in 1,459,828 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P20P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002101.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hereditary elliptocytosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GYPC | NM_002101.5 | c.60G>C | p.Pro20Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 2 of 4 | ENST00000259254.9 | NP_002092.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GYPC | ENST00000259254.9 | c.60G>C | p.Pro20Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 2 of 4 | 1 | NM_002101.5 | ENSP00000259254.4 | ||
GYPC | ENST00000356887.12 | c.-4G>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 3 of 5 | 1 | ENSP00000349354.7 | ||||
GYPC | ENST00000409836.3 | c.50-3599G>C | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 2 | 1 | ENSP00000386904.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1459828Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726340 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at