2-126693915-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_002101.5(GYPC):c.158C>T(p.Thr53Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000135 in 1,611,902 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002101.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GYPC | NM_002101.5 | c.158C>T | p.Thr53Ile | missense_variant | 3/4 | ENST00000259254.9 | NP_002092.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GYPC | ENST00000259254.9 | c.158C>T | p.Thr53Ile | missense_variant | 3/4 | 1 | NM_002101.5 | ENSP00000259254 | P2 | |
GYPC | ENST00000409836.3 | c.101C>T | p.Thr34Ile | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | ENSP00000386904 | A2 | ||
GYPC | ENST00000356887.12 | c.95C>T | p.Thr32Ile | missense_variant | 4/5 | 1 | ENSP00000349354 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000267 AC: 67AN: 251346Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000361 AC XY: 49AN XY: 135824
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000143 AC: 209AN: 1459652Hom.: 1 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000213 AC XY: 155AN XY: 726306
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152250Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000806 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74438
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Jan 05, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at