2-127063923-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_139343.3(BIN1):​c.698+10A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.355 in 1,613,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 105,053 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.31 ( 8320 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.36 ( 96733 hom. )

Consequence

BIN1
NM_139343.3 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.06

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BIN1 (HGNC:1052): (bridging integrator 1) This gene encodes several isoforms of a nucleocytoplasmic adaptor protein, one of which was initially identified as a MYC-interacting protein with features of a tumor suppressor. Isoforms that are expressed in the central nervous system may be involved in synaptic vesicle endocytosis and may interact with dynamin, synaptojanin, endophilin, and clathrin. Isoforms that are expressed in muscle and ubiquitously expressed isoforms localize to the cytoplasm and nucleus and activate a caspase-independent apoptotic process. Studies in mouse suggest that this gene plays an important role in cardiac muscle development. Alternate splicing of the gene results in several transcript variants encoding different isoforms. Aberrant splice variants expressed in tumor cell lines have also been described. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]
BIN1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • myopathy, centronuclear, 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • centronuclear myopathy
    Inheritance: SD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal dominant centronuclear myopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • autosomal recessive centronuclear myopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 2-127063923-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-127063923-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 158017.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.476 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BIN1NM_139343.3 linkc.698+10A>G intron_variant Intron 8 of 18 ENST00000316724.10 NP_647593.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BIN1ENST00000316724.10 linkc.698+10A>G intron_variant Intron 8 of 18 1 NM_139343.3 ENSP00000316779.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.315
AC:
47850
AN:
151986
Hom.:
8303
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.166
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.510
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.409
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.368
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.392
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.492
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.353
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.345
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.353
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.349
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.374
AC:
93983
AN:
251006
AF XY:
0.383
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.164
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.429
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.353
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.402
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.358
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.357
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.383
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.360
AC:
525349
AN:
1461098
Hom.:
96733
Cov.:
44
AF XY:
0.364
AC XY:
264810
AN XY:
726902
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.155
AC:
5189
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.424
AC:
18939
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.348
AC:
9094
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.352
AC:
13964
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.492
AC:
42428
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.365
AC:
19329
AN:
52900
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.401
AC:
2314
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.353
AC:
392441
AN:
1111786
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.359
AC:
21651
AN:
60374
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20679
41359
62038
82718
103397
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
12626
25252
37878
50504
63130
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.315
AC:
47893
AN:
152106
Hom.:
8320
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.322
AC XY:
23960
AN XY:
74368
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.166
AC:
6880
AN:
41486
American (AMR)
AF:
0.409
AC:
6256
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.368
AC:
1276
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.392
AC:
2024
AN:
5162
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.492
AC:
2378
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.353
AC:
3740
AN:
10580
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.340
AC:
100
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.354
AC:
24032
AN:
67968
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.351
AC:
742
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.512
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1722
3444
5165
6887
8609
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
488
976
1464
1952
2440
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.316
Hom.:
2456
Bravo
AF:
0.309
Asia WGS
AF:
0.430
AC:
1493
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Jan 28, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 24, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

698+10A>G in intron 8 of BIN1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus sequen ce. It has been identified in 34.9% (3002/8600) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.wa shington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs72481904). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, centronuclear, 2 Benign:3
Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
CADD
Benign
0.87
DANN
Benign
0.59
PhyloP100
-1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs72481904; hg19: chr2-127821499; COSMIC: COSV52116919; API