2-127063935-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting
The NM_139343.3(BIN1):c.696C>A(p.Asn232Lys) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000542 in 1,613,746 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_139343.3 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIN1 | NM_139343.3 | c.696C>A | p.Asn232Lys | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 8/19 | ENST00000316724.10 | NP_647593.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIN1 | ENST00000316724.10 | c.696C>A | p.Asn232Lys | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 8/19 | 1 | NM_139343.3 | ENSP00000316779 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000361 AC: 55AN: 152234Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000426 AC: 107AN: 251286Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000419 AC XY: 57AN XY: 135894
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000561 AC: 820AN: 1461394Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000547 AC XY: 398AN XY: 727036
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000361 AC: 55AN: 152352Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000376 AC XY: 28AN XY: 74504
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Myopathy, centronuclear, 2 Uncertain:5Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Breda Genetics srl | May 17, 2022 | Based on allele frequency, in-silico prediction scores and a certain overlap with the clinical phenotype, we interpreted this variant at least as of uncertain significance. The lack of one or more of the following features has discouraged further investigations: lack of a possible second hit in autosomal recessive conditions, presence of healthy controls in databases for autosomal dominant conditions, presence of unmatching cardinal clinical features in the patient or in the known gene-disease association, and/or variant type outside the known gene mutational spectrum. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Jun 27, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 03, 2023 | This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 232 of the BIN1 protein (p.Asn232Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs143820618, gnomAD 0.08%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BIN1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 158016). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network | - | Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 05-24-2021 by Lab Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. - |
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 29, 2022 | Reported in an individual with familial congenital heart disease, however, further clinical information was not provided and the individual may have harbored additional variants in other genes (Alankarage et al., 2019); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30293987) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | May 19, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Apr 12, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at