2-148469311-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001378120.1(MBD5):​c.1368G>T​(p.Ser456Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0016 in 1,613,604 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

MBD5
NM_001378120.1 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0790

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MBD5 (HGNC:20444): (methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5) This gene encodes a member of the methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) family. The MBD consists of about 70 residues and is the minimal region required for a methyl-CpG-binding protein binding specifically to methylated DNA. In addition to the MBD domain, this protein contains a PWWP domain (Pro-Trp-Trp-Pro motif), which consists of 100-150 amino acids and is found in numerous proteins that are involved in cell division, growth and differentiation. Mutations in this gene cause an autosomal dominant type of cognitive disability. The encoded protein interacts with the polycomb repressive complex PR-DUB which catalyzes the deubiquitination of a lysine residue of histone 2A. Haploinsufficiency of this gene is associated with a syndrome involving microcephaly, intellectual disabilities, severe speech impairment, and seizures. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found, but their full-length nature is not determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2017]
MBD5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • complex neurodevelopmental disorder
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (REVEL=0.07).
BP6
Variant 2-148469311-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-148469311-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 138174.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.079 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00116 (176/152012) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00171 (116/68004). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00145. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 89 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 176 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MBD5NM_001378120.1 linkc.1368G>T p.Ser456Ser synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 14 ENST00000642680.2 NP_001365049.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MBD5ENST00000642680.2 linkc.1368G>T p.Ser456Ser synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 14 NM_001378120.1 ENSP00000493871.2 A0A2R8YDL9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
176
AN:
152012
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0230
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000721
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000472
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00171
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00102
AC:
254
AN:
249434
AF XY:
0.000979
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000580
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000986
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00165
AC:
2410
AN:
1461592
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00154
AC XY:
1123
AN XY:
727078
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000418
AC:
14
AN:
33468
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000738
AC:
33
AN:
44690
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39656
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00154
AC:
82
AN:
53308
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00197
AC:
2194
AN:
1111936
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00139
AC:
84
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
157
314
472
629
786
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
84
168
252
336
420
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00116
AC:
176
AN:
152012
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00120
AC XY:
89
AN XY:
74220
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000483
AC:
20
AN:
41384
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000721
AC:
11
AN:
15248
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000472
AC:
5
AN:
10600
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00171
AC:
116
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00143
AC:
3
AN:
2092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10
19
29
38
48
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000784
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00140
EpiCase
AF:
0.00202
EpiControl
AF:
0.00196

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Jul 15, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 27, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Jan 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MBD5: BP4, BP7 -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 1 Benign:1
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Jun 23, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
5.4
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
0.079
Mutation Taster
=65/35
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146020786; hg19: chr2-149226880; API