2-149571135-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_015702.3(MMADHC):ā€‹c.646C>Gā€‹(p.Arg216Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00162 in 1,612,120 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0016 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

MMADHC
NM_015702.3 missense

Scores

8
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.40
Variant links:
Genes affected
MMADHC (HGNC:25221): (metabolism of cobalamin associated D) This gene encodes a mitochondrial protein that is involved in an early step of vitamin B12 metabolism. Vitamin B12 (cobalamin) is essential for normal development and survival in humans. Mutations in this gene cause methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria type cblD (MMADHC), a disorder of cobalamin metabolism that is characterized by decreased levels of the coenzymes adenosylcobalamin and methylcobalamin. Pseudogenes have been identified on chromosomes 11 and X.[provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0128771365).
BP6
Variant 2-149571135-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-149571135-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 203837.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00176 (268/152286) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00275 (187/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00243. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 128 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 10 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MMADHCNM_015702.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.646C>G p.Arg216Gly missense_variant 7/8 ENST00000303319.10 NP_056517.1 Q9H3L0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MMADHCENST00000303319.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.646C>G p.Arg216Gly missense_variant 7/81 NM_015702.3 ENSP00000301920.5 Q9H3L0
MMADHCENST00000422782.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.748C>G p.Arg250Gly missense_variant 8/95 ENSP00000408331.2 F8WEC0
MMADHCENST00000428879.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.646C>G p.Arg216Gly missense_variant 6/72 ENSP00000389060.1 Q9H3L0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00175
AC:
267
AN:
152168
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00481
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00198
AC:
497
AN:
250912
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00199
AC XY:
270
AN XY:
135628
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000696
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00591
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00229
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00161
AC:
2348
AN:
1459834
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00167
AC XY:
1216
AN XY:
726248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000897
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000627
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00184
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000430
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00608
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00164
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00136
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00176
AC:
268
AN:
152286
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00172
AC XY:
128
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000168
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000719
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00481
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00321
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00113
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00140
AC:
12
ExAC
AF:
0.00192
AC:
233

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria type cblD Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Nov 11, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 30, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 15, 2017The R216G variant in the MMADHC gene has not been published as a mutation, nor has it been reported as a benign polymorphism to our knowledge. The R216G variant was not observed at any significant frequency in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. The R216G variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which occurs at a position that is conserved in mammals. In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. We interpret R216G as a variant of unknown significance. This variant has been observed to be maternally inherited. -
MMADHC-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 11, 2024This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Disorders of Intracellular Cobalamin Metabolism Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.15
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.20
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.060
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.72
D;D;D
Eigen
Benign
0.024
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.072
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.66
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
.;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.082
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.013
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.053
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.4
M;M;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.37
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.8
D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.48
Sift
Benign
0.27
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.38
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.31
B;B;P
Vest4
0.49
MVP
0.80
MPC
0.083
ClinPred
0.037
T
GERP RS
5.4
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.32
gMVP
0.41

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141093638; hg19: chr2-150427649; API