2-151490504-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting
The NM_001164507.2(NEB):c.25165C>T(p.Arg8389Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000758 in 1,609,076 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R8389Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164507.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | NM_001164507.2 | c.25165C>T | p.Arg8389Trp | missense_variant | 180/182 | ENST00000427231.7 | |
NEB | NM_001164508.2 | c.25165C>T | p.Arg8389Trp | missense_variant | 180/182 | ENST00000397345.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.25165C>T | p.Arg8389Trp | missense_variant | 180/182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | P5 | |
NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.25165C>T | p.Arg8389Trp | missense_variant | 180/182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000137 AC: 33AN: 240516Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000184 AC XY: 24AN XY: 130146
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000700 AC: 102AN: 1456756Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000953 AC XY: 69AN XY: 723932
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74478
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:3Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Jan 17, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 10, 2021 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Oct 31, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 20, 2017 | The R8424W variant in the NEB gene has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant, nor as a benign variant, to our knowledge. The R8424W variant is observed in 10/12108 (0.08%) alleles from individuals of South Asian background, in the ExAC dataset (Lek et al., 2016). The R8424W variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved across species. In silico analysis predicts this variant is probably damaging to the protein structure/function. We interpret R8424W as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at