2-151499356-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_001164508.2(NEB):c.24056C>A(p.Pro8019Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P8019L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164508.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001164508.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEB | MANE Plus Clinical | c.24056C>A | p.Pro8019Gln | missense | Exon 169 of 182 | NP_001157979.2 | P20929-3 | ||
| NEB | MANE Select | c.24056C>A | p.Pro8019Gln | missense | Exon 169 of 182 | NP_001157980.2 | P20929-2 | ||
| NEB | c.24161C>A | p.Pro8054Gln | missense | Exon 170 of 183 | NP_001258137.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEB | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.24056C>A | p.Pro8019Gln | missense | Exon 169 of 182 | ENSP00000380505.3 | P20929-2 | ||
| NEB | TSL:5 MANE Plus Clinical | c.24056C>A | p.Pro8019Gln | missense | Exon 169 of 182 | ENSP00000416578.2 | P20929-3 | ||
| NEB | c.839C>A | p.Pro280Gln | missense | Exon 10 of 21 | ENSP00000509628.1 | A0A8I5KS37 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 27
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at