2-151516460-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001164507.2(NEB):c.22904G>A(p.Gly7635Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00162 in 1,605,246 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 37 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/23 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G7635G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164507.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.22904G>A | p.Gly7635Glu | missense_variant | Exon 157 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505.3 | ||
| NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.22904G>A | p.Gly7635Glu | missense_variant | Exon 157 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00228 AC: 346AN: 152086Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00519 AC: 1283AN: 247432 AF XY: 0.00477 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00155 AC: 2254AN: 1453042Hom.: 29 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00147 AC XY: 1064AN XY: 723208 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00226 AC: 344AN: 152204Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00242 AC XY: 180AN XY: 74416 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
- -
Nemaline myopathy 2 Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Variant summary: The NEB c.23009G>A (p.Gly7670Glu) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 2/3 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). 4/5 splice prediction tools predict strenthening of the canonical splicing site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 556/106474 control chromosomes (12 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the East Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.049128 (383/7796). This frequency is about 14 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic NEB variant (0.0035355), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of East Asian origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at