2-151527570-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2_Supporting
The NM_001164507.2(NEB):āc.21751C>Gā(p.Gln7251Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000282 in 1,611,724 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q7251R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164507.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001164507.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEB | NM_001164507.2 | MANE Plus Clinical | c.21751C>G | p.Gln7251Glu | missense | Exon 147 of 182 | NP_001157979.2 | ||
| NEB | NM_001164508.2 | MANE Select | c.21751C>G | p.Gln7251Glu | missense | Exon 147 of 182 | NP_001157980.2 | ||
| NEB | NM_001271208.2 | c.21856C>G | p.Gln7286Glu | missense | Exon 148 of 183 | NP_001258137.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.21751C>G | p.Gln7251Glu | missense | Exon 147 of 182 | ENSP00000380505.3 | ||
| NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | TSL:5 MANE Plus Clinical | c.21751C>G | p.Gln7251Glu | missense | Exon 147 of 182 | ENSP00000416578.2 | ||
| NEB | ENST00000409198.5 | TSL:5 | c.16648C>G | p.Gln5550Glu | missense | Exon 120 of 150 | ENSP00000386259.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000375 AC: 57AN: 152102Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000505 AC: 124AN: 245558 AF XY: 0.000526 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000272 AC: 397AN: 1459622Hom.: 3 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000276 AC XY: 200AN XY: 725888 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000375 AC: 57AN: 152102Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000404 AC XY: 30AN XY: 74304 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:2Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.
not specified Uncertain:1
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.16648C>G (p.Q5550E) alteration is located in exon 120 (coding exon 118) of the NEB gene. This alteration results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 16648, causing the glutamine (Q) at amino acid position 5550 to be replaced by a glutamic acid (E). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at