2-151636322-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_001164508.2(NEB):c.9007C>G(p.Leu3003Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000199 in 1,605,694 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164508.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.9007C>G | p.Leu3003Val | missense_variant | Exon 64 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505.3 | ||
NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.9007C>G | p.Leu3003Val | missense_variant | Exon 64 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578.2 | ||
NEB | ENST00000409198.5 | c.8853+3571C>G | intron_variant | Intron 62 of 149 | 5 | ENSP00000386259.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000413 AC: 1AN: 241928Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 131690
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000213 AC: 31AN: 1453516Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000166 AC XY: 12AN XY: 723214
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74338
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:2
- -
- -
not provided Uncertain:1
The L3003V variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. The L3003V variant is not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016; 1000 Genomes Consortium et al., 2015; Exome Variant Server). This variant is a conservative amino acid substitution, which is not likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues share similar properties. However, this substitution occurs at a position that is conserved in mammals. In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at