2-151640012-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001164508.2(NEB):āc.8734T>Cā(p.Ser2912Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.207 in 1,613,564 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 49,168 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164508.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | NM_001164507.2 | c.8734T>C | p.Ser2912Pro | missense_variant | 62/182 | ENST00000427231.7 | NP_001157979.2 | |
NEB | NM_001164508.2 | c.8734T>C | p.Ser2912Pro | missense_variant | 62/182 | ENST00000397345.8 | NP_001157980.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.8734T>C | p.Ser2912Pro | missense_variant | 62/182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505.3 | ||
NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.8734T>C | p.Ser2912Pro | missense_variant | 62/182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578.2 | ||
NEB | ENST00000409198.5 | c.8734T>C | p.Ser2912Pro | missense_variant | 62/150 | 5 | ENSP00000386259.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.313 AC: 47545AN: 151980Hom.: 10994 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.243 AC: 60525AN: 249014Hom.: 10708 AF XY: 0.240 AC XY: 32451AN XY: 135072
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.196 AC: 286005AN: 1461466Hom.: 38114 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.198 AC XY: 144180AN XY: 727032
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.313 AC: 47659AN: 152098Hom.: 11054 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.310 AC XY: 23054AN XY: 74360
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 26, 2014 | p.Ser2912Pro in exon 62 of NEB: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 60% (2256/3774) of African American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu /EVS/; dbSNP rs6713162). - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 05, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Nemaline myopathy 2 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 04, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 27, 2017 | Variant summary: The NEB c.8734T>C (p.Ser2912Pro) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not working at the time of classification). This variant was found in 30671/120746 control chromosomes (5615 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.2540126, which is approximately 72 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic NEB variant (0.0035355), evidence this variant is a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at