2-166196010-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2

The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):​c.*2662G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00619 in 152,224 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0062 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

SCN9A
NM_001365536.1 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.714
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN9A (HGNC:10597): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9) This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel which plays a significant role in nociception signaling. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary erythermalgia, channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain, and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
SCN1A-AS1 (HGNC:54069): (SCN1A and SCN9A antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.97).
BP6
Variant 2-166196010-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166196010-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 331906.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00619 (942/152224) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.052 (251/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0467. There are 14 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 499 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 14 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
SCN9ANM_001365536.1 linkc.*2662G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 27/27 ENST00000642356.2 NP_001352465.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN9AENST00000642356 linkc.*2662G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 27/27 NM_001365536.1 ENSP00000495601.1 Q15858-1
SCN9AENST00000303354 linkc.*2662G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 27/275 ENSP00000304748.7 Q15858-1
SCN9AENST00000409672 linkc.*2662G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 27/275 ENSP00000386306.1 Q15858-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00618
AC:
940
AN:
152106
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00171
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00570
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0493
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00908
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0518
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000471
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00416
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0100
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0;AS_VQSR
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
40
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
34
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00619
AC:
942
AN:
152224
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00670
AC XY:
499
AN XY:
74430
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00171
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00569
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0493
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00910
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0520
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000471
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00416
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0104
Alfa
AF:
0.00418
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00527
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0360
AC:
126
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary erythromelalgia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Inherited Erythromelalgia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Channelopathy-associated congenital insensitivity to pain, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.97
CADD
Benign
0.74
DANN
Benign
0.48

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149873320; hg19: chr2-167052520; API